Categories
Online Marketing

Marquis De Condorcet

Much 1794 known as Nicolas de condorcet was a French philosopher mathematician and early political scientist, whose Condorcet method in voting tally selects the candidate who would beat each of the other candidates in a runoff election.

Unlike many of his contemporaries, he advocated a liberal economy, free and equal public instruction, constitutionalism and equal rights for women and people of all races. His ideas and writings were said to embody the ideals of the Age of Enlightenment and rationalism and remain influential to this day. He died a mysterious death in prison after a period of flight from French revolutionary authorities, Part 1 early years.

Kahn Dorset was born in Rivermont in present-day AC and descended from the ancient family of carrot at who took their title from the town of Khan Dorset. Endorphine of which they were longtime residents, fatherless at a young age, he was raised by his devoutly religious mother. He was educated at the Jesuit college in Reims and at the College de Navarre in Paris, where he quickly showed his intellectual ability and gained his first public distinctions in mathematics when he was 16.

His analytical abilities gained the praise of Jean wanted alembert and alexis Claire out soon, Khan Dorsett would study and until ambit from 1765 to 1774. He focused on science. In 1765, he published his first work on mathematics entitled s Erlik alkyl, integral, which was well-received launching his career as a mathematician. He would go on to publish more papers and on the 25th of February 1769 he was elected to the académie Royale de Sciences, French Royal Academy of Sciences.

In 1772. He published another paper on integral calculus soon after he met Jack, Turgut, a French economist and the two became friends. Turgut was to be an administrator under King Louis, the 15th in 1772, and became Controller General of Finance under Louis X. The sixth in 1774 Khan Dorset worked with Leonhardt Euler and Benjamin Franklin. He soon became an honorary member of many foreign academies and philosophic societies, including the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 1785 for an honorary member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 1792, and also in Prussia and Russia.

His political ideas, however, many of them in continuity with tur goats, were criticized heavily in the english-speaking world, most notably by John Adams, who wrote two of his principal works of political philosophy. Two opposed her God and conduct Jets, unicameral legislature and radical democracy. Part two early political career in 1774 Condorcet was appointed inspector general of the paris mint by tergat.

From this point on, Condorcet shifted his focus from the purely mathematical to philosophy and political matters. In the following years, he took up the defense of human rights in general and of women’s and blacks rights, in particular an abolitionist he became active in the Society of the Friends of the blacks in the 1780s. He supported the ideals embodied by the newly formed United States and proposed projects of political, administrative and economic reforms intended to transform France in 1776.

Turgut was dismissed as Controller General. Consequently, Condorcet submitted his resignation as Inspector General of the mone II, but the request was refused and he continued serving in this post until 1791. Condorcet later wrote, Phi DM turgut 1786, a biography which spoke fondly of turgut and advocated turgut’s economic theories. Condorcet continued to receive prestigious appointments. In 1777 he became permanent secretary of the académie des Sciences holding the post until the abolition of the academia in 1793 and in 1782 circuitry of the Academie Francaise part, three condo jets paradox and the Condorcet method.

In 1785, Conn Dorsett wrote an essay on the application of analysis of the probability of decisions made on a majority vote, one of his most important works. This work described several now-famous results, including condo jets, jury theorem, which states that if each member of a voting group is more likely than not to make a correct decision, the probability that the highest vote of the group is the correct decision increases.

As the number of members of the group increases and condo jets paradox, which shows that majority preferences can become intransitive with three or more options, it is possible for a certain electorate to express a preference for over B, a preference for B over C and the preference For C over a all from the same set of ballots, the paper also outlines of generic Condorcet method designed to simulate pairwise elections between all candidates in an election.

He disagreed strongly with the alternative method of aggregating preferences. Put forth by Gene shall Deeb order based on some dranking zuv alternatives. Kahn Dorset was one of the first to systematically apply mathematics in the social sciences, part for other works. In 1781, Kahn Dorset wrote a pamphlet reflections on migros slavery, in which he denounced slavery. In 1786, Kahn Dorset worked on ideas for the differential and integral calculus, giving a new treatment of infinite resource, a work which was never printed.

In 1789 he published vide D Voltaire 1789, which agreed with Voltaire in his opposition to the church in 1791 Condorcet, along with Sophie D, Grucci Thomas Paine, Etienne Dumont, jacques pierre Brigitte and Achilles da chaste, let published a brief journal titled the Republic Ain its main goal. Being the promotion of republicanism and the rejection of establishing a constitutional monarchy, the theme being that any sort of monarchy is a threat to freedom, no matter who is leading, which emphasized that Liberty as freedom from domination in 1795 Condorcet had a book published called sketch for A historical picture of the progress of the human mind it dealt with theoretical thought on perfecting the human mind and analyzing intellectual history based around social arithmetic.

Thomas Malthus wrote an essay on the principle of population 1798, partly in response to condole Chet’s views on the perfectibility of society. Part 5. French Revolution part five: French Revolution chapter, one deputy Condorcet took a leading role when the French Revolution swept France in 1789, hoping for a rationalist reconstruction of society and championed many liberal causes. As a result, in 1791 he was elected as a Paris representative in the Legislative Assembly and then became the Secretary of the Assembly.

In April 1792, Condorcet presented a project for the reformation of the education system, aiming to create a hierarchical system under the authority of experts who would work as the guardians of the Enlightenment and who independent of power would be the guarantors of public liberties. The project was judged to be contrary to the Republican and egalitarian virtues, giving the education of the nation over to an aristocracy of Savitz.

The institution adopted conduct jets designed for the state education system, and he drafted a proposed bourbon Constitution for the new France. He advocated women’s suffrage for the new government. Writing an article for journal de la Sol, siete D 1789 and by publishing deal admission des femmes. Odroid d cite in 1790 in terms of political party. Condorcet was quite independent, but still counted many friends among the Girondins.

However, he distanced himself from them during the National Convention because he disliked their factionalism at the trial of Louis X. The 6th Kahn Dorsett, who opposed the death penalty but still supported to the trial itself, spoke out against the execution of the king during the public vote. At the convention he proposed to send the King to the galleys Kahn Dorsett was on the Constitution committee and was the main author of the gerund in constitutional project.

The Constitution was not put to vote. When the Montagnard gained control of the convention. They wrote their owned. The French constitution of 1793 Khanh Dorsett criticized the new work and, as a result, he was branded a traitor on the 3rd of October 1793, a warrant was issued for condo, Chen’s arrest, part 5, French Revolution, chapter 2 arrest and death. The warrant forced Condorcet into hiding.

He hid for five or eight months in the house of Vernet on rusev and oniy in Paris. It was there that he wrote a squid and to blow historic des progress, deal Esprit who mean sketch for a historical picture of the progress of the human spirit which was published posthumously in 1795 and is considered one of the major texts of the Enlightenment and of Historical thought it narrates the history of civilization, as one of progress in the sciences shows the intimate connection between scientific progress and the development of human rights and justice and outlines the features of a future rational society entirely shaped by scientific knowledge.

On the 25th of March 1794, Condorcet convinced he was no longer safe, left his hideout and attempted to flee Paris. He went to seek refuge at the house of jean-baptiste su art, a friend of his whom he resided with in 1772, but they refused him on the basis that one of their current residents might betray his presence. Two days later, he was arrested in climate and imprisoned in Bourg la reine or, as it was known during the revolution borg illegally, a quality borough rather than Queensboro two days after that, he was found dead in his cell.

The most widely accepted theory is that his friend Pierre, Jean Georges cabarrus, gave him a poison which he eventually used. However, some historians believe that he may have been murdered, perhaps because he was too loved and respected to be executed. Jean Pierre brand caught in his work lair light la mort de la revolucion claims that Condorcet was killed with a mixture of datura stramonium and opium.

Condorcet was symbolically interred in the pantheon in 1989, in honor of the Bicentennial of the French Revolution and conduct Jeff’s role. As a central figure in the nth, lightin meant, however, his coffin was empty interred in the Commons cemetery of bort Lorraine. His remains were lost during the 19th century part six family in 1786, Condorcet married sophie d Grucci, who was more than twenty years.

His junior, his wife reckoned one of the most beautiful women of the day, became an accomplished salon, hostesses Midland econ Dorsett, and also an accomplished translator of Thomas Paine and Adam Smith. She was intelligent and well-educated fluent in both English and Italian. The marriage was a strong one and Sofie visited her husband regularly, while he remained in hiding. Although she began proceedings for divorce in January 1794, it was at the insistence of Condorcet and cabañas who wished to protect their property from expropriation and to provide financially for Sophie and their young daughter.

Louise Eliza Alexandrine Khan Dorset was survived by his widow and their four-year-old daughter, Eliza Sophie died in 1822, never having remarried and having published all her husband’s works between 1801 and 1804. Her work was carried on by their daughter, Eliza Khan Dorsett O’Conner, wife of former United Irishmen Arthur O’Conner. The Condorcet IKONOS brought out a revised edition between 1847 and 18-49 part seven, gender equality, Kondo Jettas work was mainly focused on a quest for a more egalitarian society.

This path led him to think and write about gender equality in the revolutionary context. In 1790, he published delight mission des femmes Odroid D site on the admission of women to the rights of citizenship in which he strongly advocated for women’s suffrage in the New Republic, as well as the enlargement of basic political and social rights to include women. One of the most famous enlightenment thinkers at the time he was one of the first to make such a radical proposal a visionary.

He identified gender as a social construction based on perceived differences in sex and rejected biological determinism as being able to explain gender relations in society. He denounced patriarchal norms of oppression present at every institutional level and continuously subjugating and marginalizing. Women, like fellow Enlightenment, think jean-jacques Rousseau in his book. Amie luteal, education, 1762 Khan Dorsett, identified education as crucial to the emancipation of individuals.

He stated if I believe that all other differences between men and women are simply the result of educ a tion. He saw it as the only solution for women to deconstruct gender roles and promotes another kind of masculinity not based on violence, virility and the subjugation of women, but rather on shared attributes such as reason and intelligence. In his book, essays in the philosophy of humanism Oaks calls this new concept: feminine masculinity, Fenny, w models of SEL, FASS, er tion that do not require the construction of an enemies other, be it a woman or the symbolic feminine for them to define themselves AG AI Ns teef condor jets, hopefully for gender equality as founded on the recognition that the attribution of rights and authority comes from the false assumption that men possess reason and women do know.

This is, according to Nall an obvious example of an individual practicing and advocating this feminist masculinity, as such, women should enjoy the same fundamental natural right scholars often disagree on the true impact that conduct Jets. Work had on pre-modern feminist thinking. His detractors point out that when he was eventually given some responsibilities in the constitutional drafting process, his convictions did not translate into concrete political action and made limited efforts to push these issues on the agenda.

Some scholars, on the other hand, believed that this lack of action is not due to the weakness of his commitment, but rather to the political atmosphere at the time and the absence of political appetite for gender equality on the part of decision-makers. Kondo Jeff’s work for gender equality as even more visionary that it has to be considered in a context where the inclusion of women in the public sphere was feared by many revolutionaries.

Along with authors such as Mary Wellstone draft Lambert, aural emptied gouges, Condorcet made a lasting contribution to the pre feminist debate, his advocacy for the empowerment of women in politics inspired new feminists, who eventually fulfilled his vision in the 19th century part eight, the idea of progress, Condo jets, sketch for a historical picture of the progress of the human spirit, 1795 was perhaps the most influential formulation of the idea of progress ever written.

It made the idea of progress. A central concern of enlightenment thought he argued that expanding knowledge in the natural and Social Sciences would lead to an ever more just world of individual freedom, material affluence and moral compassion. He argued for three general propositions that the past revealed an order that could be understood in terms of the progressive development of human capabilities showing that humanity’s present state and those through which it has passed, are a necessary Constitution of the moral composition of humankind that the Progress of the Natural Sciences must be followed by progress in the moral and political sciences, no less certain, no less secure from political revolutions.

That social evils are the result of ignorance and there are rather and an inevitable consequence of human nature. Kondou Jeff’s writings were a key contribution to the French enlightenment, particularly his work on the idea of progress. Condorcet believed that, through the use of our senses and communication with others, knowledge could be compared and contrasted as a way of analyzing our systems of belief and understanding.

None of kondal Chet’s writings refer to a belief in a religion or a God who intervenes in human affairs. Condorcet instead frequently had written of his faith in humanity itself and its ability to progress with the help of philosophers such as Aristotle. Through this accumulation and sharing of knowledge, he believed it was possible for any man to comprehend all the known facts of the natural world.

The N lightin menteur the natural world, spurred the desire for enlightenment, of the social and political world Khan Dorsett believed that there was no definition of the perfect human existence and vers believed that the progression of the human race would inevitably continue throughout the course of our Existence he envisioned man as continually progressing toward a perfectly utopian society. He believed when the great potential towards growth of the demand possessed.

However, con dorset’s stressed that for this to be a possibility, man must unify regardless of race, religion, culture or gender. To this end, he became a member of the French sociate, a pessimist, desn’t Wars, Society of the Friends of the blacks. He wrote a set of rules for the Society of the Friends of the blacks, which detailed the reasoning and goals behind the organization, along with describing the injustice of slavery and put in a statement calling for the abolition of slave trade.

As the first step to true abolition, Condorcet was also a strong proponent of women’s civil rights. He claimed that women are equal to men in nearly every aspect and asked. Why, then, should they be debarred from their fundamental civil rights? The few differences that do exist are due to the fact that women are limited by their lack of rights. Khan Dorsett even mentioned several women who were more capable then average men’s, such as Queen Elizabeth and Maria Theresa part 9 civic duty for condo jets.

Republicanism, the nation needed enlightened citizens and education needed democracy to become truly public. Democracy implied free citizens and ignorance was the source of servitude. Citizens had to be provided with the necessary knowledge to exercise their freedom and understand the rights and laws that guaranteed their enjoyment. Although education could not eliminate disparities in talent, all citizens, including women, had the right to free education in opposition to those who relied on revolutionary enthusiasm to form the new Citizens.

Kahn Dorset maintained that the Revolution was not made to last and that revolutionary institutions were not intended to prolong the revolutionary experience, but to establish political rules and legal mechanisms that would ensure future changes without revolution. In a democratic City, there would be no Bastille to be seized, public education, red form, free and responsible citizens, not revolutionaries part 10 evaluation.

Rothschild 2001 argues that Condorcet has been seen since the 1790s as the embodiment of the cold, rational enlightenment. However, she suggests his writings on economic policy voting and public instruction indicate different views both of Condorcet and of the Enlightenment. Condorcet was concerned with individual diversity. He was opposed to pro to utilitarian theories. He considered individual independence, which he described as the characteristic liberty of the moderns, to be of central political importance, and he opposed the imposition of universal and eternal principles.

His efforts to reconcile the universality of some values when the diversity of individual opinions are of continuing interest. He emphasizes the institutions of civilized or constitutional conflict, recognizes conflicts or inconsistency within individuals and sees Moral Sentiments as the foundation of universal values. His difficulties call into question some familiar distinctions, for example between French, German and English, Scottish thought and between the Enlightenment and the counter and lightened.

There was substantial continuity between conduct, Jeff’s criticism of the economic ideas of the 1760s and the liberal thought of the early 19th century. The Lycee Condorcet in the rue du är and the 9th arrondissement of paris is named in his honor as a streets. In many French cities, special characters in this article was substituted with audio cues. They were denoted as follows, and beginning and ending single or double quotations and left and right for emphasis.

This recording as a derivative work from Wikipedia for more information to Commission recordings like this and to support the developer. Please visit http://www.Potterybarn.Com for


 

Categories
Online Marketing

Marquis De Condorcet

Much 1794 known as Nicolas de condorcet was a French philosopher mathematician and early political scientist, whose Condorcet method in voting tally selects the candidate who would beat each of the other candidates in a runoff election.

Unlike many of his contemporaries, he advocated a liberal economy, free and equal public instruction, constitutionalism and equal rights for women and people of all races. His ideas and writings were said to embody the ideals of the Age of Enlightenment and rationalism and remain influential to this day. He died a mysterious death in prison after a period of flight from French revolutionary authorities, Part 1 early years.

Kahn Dorset was born in Rivermont in present-day AC and descended from the ancient family of carrot at who took their title from the town of Khan Dorset. Endorphine of which they were longtime residents, fatherless at a young age, he was raised by his devoutly religious mother. He was educated at the Jesuit college in Reims and at the College de Navarre in Paris, where he quickly showed his intellectual ability and gained his first public distinctions in mathematics when he was 16.

His analytical abilities gained the praise of Jean wanted alembert and alexis Claire out soon, Khan Dorsett would study and until ambit from 1765 to 1774. He focused on science. In 1765, he published his first work on mathematics entitled s Erlik alkyl, integral, which was well-received launching his career as a mathematician. He would go on to publish more papers and on the 25th of February 1769 he was elected to the académie Royale de Sciences, French Royal Academy of Sciences.

In 1772. He published another paper on integral calculus soon after he met Jack, Turgut, a French economist and the two became friends. Turgut was to be an administrator under King Louis, the 15th in 1772, and became Controller General of Finance under Louis X. The sixth in 1774 Khan Dorset worked with Leonhardt Euler and Benjamin Franklin. He soon became an honorary member of many foreign academies and philosophic societies, including the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 1785 for an honorary member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 1792, and also in Prussia and Russia.

His political ideas, however, many of them in continuity with tur goats, were criticized heavily in the english-speaking world, most notably by John Adams, who wrote two of his principal works of political philosophy. Two opposed her God and conduct Jets, unicameral legislature and radical democracy. Part two early political career in 1774 Condorcet was appointed inspector general of the paris mint by tergat.

From this point on, Condorcet shifted his focus from the purely mathematical to philosophy and political matters. In the following years, he took up the defense of human rights in general and of women’s and blacks rights, in particular an abolitionist he became active in the Society of the Friends of the blacks in the 1780s. He supported the ideals embodied by the newly formed United States and proposed projects of political, administrative and economic reforms intended to transform France in 1776.

Turgut was dismissed as Controller General. Consequently, Condorcet submitted his resignation as Inspector General of the mone II, but the request was refused and he continued serving in this post until 1791. Condorcet later wrote, Phi DM turgut 1786, a biography which spoke fondly of turgut and advocated turgut’s economic theories. Condorcet continued to receive prestigious appointments. In 1777 he became permanent secretary of the académie des Sciences holding the post until the abolition of the academia in 1793 and in 1782 circuitry of the Academie Francaise part, three condo jets paradox and the Condorcet method.

In 1785, Conn Dorsett wrote an essay on the application of analysis of the probability of decisions made on a majority vote, one of his most important works. This work described several now-famous results, including condo jets, jury theorem, which states that if each member of a voting group is more likely than not to make a correct decision, the probability that the highest vote of the group is the correct decision increases.

As the number of members of the group increases and condo jets paradox, which shows that majority preferences can become intransitive with three or more options, it is possible for a certain electorate to express a preference for over B, a preference for B over C and the preference For C over a all from the same set of ballots, the paper also outlines of generic Condorcet method designed to simulate pairwise elections between all candidates in an election.

He disagreed strongly with the alternative method of aggregating preferences. Put forth by Gene shall Deeb order based on some dranking zuv alternatives. Kahn Dorset was one of the first to systematically apply mathematics in the social sciences, part for other works. In 1781, Kahn Dorset wrote a pamphlet reflections on migros slavery, in which he denounced slavery. In 1786, Kahn Dorset worked on ideas for the differential and integral calculus, giving a new treatment of infinite resource, a work which was never printed.

In 1789 he published vide D Voltaire 1789, which agreed with Voltaire in his opposition to the church in 1791 Condorcet, along with Sophie D, Grucci Thomas Paine, Etienne Dumont, jacques pierre Brigitte and Achilles da chaste, let published a brief journal titled the Republic Ain its main goal. Being the promotion of republicanism and the rejection of establishing a constitutional monarchy, the theme being that any sort of monarchy is a threat to freedom, no matter who is leading, which emphasized that Liberty as freedom from domination in 1795 Condorcet had a book published called sketch for A historical picture of the progress of the human mind it dealt with theoretical thought on perfecting the human mind and analyzing intellectual history based around social arithmetic.

Thomas Malthus wrote an essay on the principle of population 1798, partly in response to condole Chet’s views on the perfectibility of society. Part 5. French Revolution part five: French Revolution chapter, one deputy Condorcet took a leading role when the French Revolution swept France in 1789, hoping for a rationalist reconstruction of society and championed many liberal causes. As a result, in 1791 he was elected as a Paris representative in the Legislative Assembly and then became the Secretary of the Assembly.

In April 1792, Condorcet presented a project for the reformation of the education system, aiming to create a hierarchical system under the authority of experts who would work as the guardians of the Enlightenment and who independent of power would be the guarantors of public liberties. The project was judged to be contrary to the Republican and egalitarian virtues, giving the education of the nation over to an aristocracy of Savitz.

The institution adopted conduct jets designed for the state education system, and he drafted a proposed bourbon Constitution for the new France. He advocated women’s suffrage for the new government. Writing an article for journal de la Sol, siete D 1789 and by publishing deal admission des femmes. Odroid d cite in 1790 in terms of political party. Condorcet was quite independent, but still counted many friends among the Girondins.

However, he distanced himself from them during the National Convention because he disliked their factionalism at the trial of Louis X. The 6th Kahn Dorsett, who opposed the death penalty but still supported to the trial itself, spoke out against the execution of the king during the public vote. At the convention he proposed to send the King to the galleys Kahn Dorsett was on the Constitution committee and was the main author of the gerund in constitutional project.

The Constitution was not put to vote. When the Montagnard gained control of the convention. They wrote their owned. The French constitution of 1793 Khanh Dorsett criticized the new work and, as a result, he was branded a traitor on the 3rd of October 1793, a warrant was issued for condo, Chen’s arrest, part 5, French Revolution, chapter 2 arrest and death. The warrant forced Condorcet into hiding.

He hid for five or eight months in the house of Vernet on rusev and oniy in Paris. It was there that he wrote a squid and to blow historic des progress, deal Esprit who mean sketch for a historical picture of the progress of the human spirit which was published posthumously in 1795 and is considered one of the major texts of the Enlightenment and of Historical thought it narrates the history of civilization, as one of progress in the sciences shows the intimate connection between scientific progress and the development of human rights and justice and outlines the features of a future rational society entirely shaped by scientific knowledge.

On the 25th of March 1794, Condorcet convinced he was no longer safe, left his hideout and attempted to flee Paris. He went to seek refuge at the house of jean-baptiste su art, a friend of his whom he resided with in 1772, but they refused him on the basis that one of their current residents might betray his presence. Two days later, he was arrested in climate and imprisoned in Bourg la reine or, as it was known during the revolution borg illegally, a quality borough rather than Queensboro two days after that, he was found dead in his cell.

The most widely accepted theory is that his friend Pierre, Jean Georges cabarrus, gave him a poison which he eventually used. However, some historians believe that he may have been murdered, perhaps because he was too loved and respected to be executed. Jean Pierre brand caught in his work lair light la mort de la revolucion claims that Condorcet was killed with a mixture of datura stramonium and opium.

Condorcet was symbolically interred in the pantheon in 1989, in honor of the Bicentennial of the French Revolution and conduct Jeff’s role. As a central figure in the nth, lightin meant, however, his coffin was empty interred in the Commons cemetery of bort Lorraine. His remains were lost during the 19th century part six family in 1786, Condorcet married sophie d Grucci, who was more than twenty years.

His junior, his wife reckoned one of the most beautiful women of the day, became an accomplished salon, hostesses Midland econ Dorsett, and also an accomplished translator of Thomas Paine and Adam Smith. She was intelligent and well-educated fluent in both English and Italian. The marriage was a strong one and Sofie visited her husband regularly, while he remained in hiding. Although she began proceedings for divorce in January 1794, it was at the insistence of Condorcet and cabañas who wished to protect their property from expropriation and to provide financially for Sophie and their young daughter.

Louise Eliza Alexandrine Khan Dorset was survived by his widow and their four-year-old daughter, Eliza Sophie died in 1822, never having remarried and having published all her husband’s works between 1801 and 1804. Her work was carried on by their daughter, Eliza Khan Dorsett O’Conner, wife of former United Irishmen Arthur O’Conner. The Condorcet IKONOS brought out a revised edition between 1847 and 18-49 part seven, gender equality, Kondo Jettas work was mainly focused on a quest for a more egalitarian society.

This path led him to think and write about gender equality in the revolutionary context. In 1790, he published delight mission des femmes Odroid D site on the admission of women to the rights of citizenship in which he strongly advocated for women’s suffrage in the New Republic, as well as the enlargement of basic political and social rights to include women. One of the most famous enlightenment thinkers at the time he was one of the first to make such a radical proposal a visionary.

He identified gender as a social construction based on perceived differences in sex and rejected biological determinism as being able to explain gender relations in society. He denounced patriarchal norms of oppression present at every institutional level and continuously subjugating and marginalizing. Women, like fellow Enlightenment, think jean-jacques Rousseau in his book. Amie luteal, education, 1762 Khan Dorsett, identified education as crucial to the emancipation of individuals.

He stated if I believe that all other differences between men and women are simply the result of educ a tion. He saw it as the only solution for women to deconstruct gender roles and promotes another kind of masculinity not based on violence, virility and the subjugation of women, but rather on shared attributes such as reason and intelligence. In his book, essays in the philosophy of humanism Oaks calls this new concept: feminine masculinity, Fenny, w models of SEL, FASS, er tion that do not require the construction of an enemies other, be it a woman or the symbolic feminine for them to define themselves AG AI Ns teef condor jets, hopefully for gender equality as founded on the recognition that the attribution of rights and authority comes from the false assumption that men possess reason and women do know.

This is, according to Nall an obvious example of an individual practicing and advocating this feminist masculinity, as such, women should enjoy the same fundamental natural right scholars often disagree on the true impact that conduct Jets. Work had on pre-modern feminist thinking. His detractors point out that when he was eventually given some responsibilities in the constitutional drafting process, his convictions did not translate into concrete political action and made limited efforts to push these issues on the agenda.

Some scholars, on the other hand, believed that this lack of action is not due to the weakness of his commitment, but rather to the political atmosphere at the time and the absence of political appetite for gender equality on the part of decision-makers. Kondo Jeff’s work for gender equality as even more visionary that it has to be considered in a context where the inclusion of women in the public sphere was feared by many revolutionaries.

Along with authors such as Mary Wellstone draft Lambert, aural emptied gouges, Condorcet made a lasting contribution to the pre feminist debate, his advocacy for the empowerment of women in politics inspired new feminists, who eventually fulfilled his vision in the 19th century part eight, the idea of progress, Condo jets, sketch for a historical picture of the progress of the human spirit, 1795 was perhaps the most influential formulation of the idea of progress ever written.

It made the idea of progress. A central concern of enlightenment thought he argued that expanding knowledge in the natural and Social Sciences would lead to an ever more just world of individual freedom, material affluence and moral compassion. He argued for three general propositions that the past revealed an order that could be understood in terms of the progressive development of human capabilities showing that humanity’s present state and those through which it has passed, are a necessary Constitution of the moral composition of humankind that the Progress of the Natural Sciences must be followed by progress in the moral and political sciences, no less certain, no less secure from political revolutions.

That social evils are the result of ignorance and there are rather and an inevitable consequence of human nature. Kondou Jeff’s writings were a key contribution to the French enlightenment, particularly his work on the idea of progress. Condorcet believed that, through the use of our senses and communication with others, knowledge could be compared and contrasted as a way of analyzing our systems of belief and understanding.

None of kondal Chet’s writings refer to a belief in a religion or a God who intervenes in human affairs. Condorcet instead frequently had written of his faith in humanity itself and its ability to progress with the help of philosophers such as Aristotle. Through this accumulation and sharing of knowledge, he believed it was possible for any man to comprehend all the known facts of the natural world.

The N lightin menteur the natural world, spurred the desire for enlightenment, of the social and political world Khan Dorsett believed that there was no definition of the perfect human existence and vers believed that the progression of the human race would inevitably continue throughout the course of our Existence he envisioned man as continually progressing toward a perfectly utopian society. He believed when the great potential towards growth of the demand possessed.

However, con dorset’s stressed that for this to be a possibility, man must unify regardless of race, religion, culture or gender. To this end, he became a member of the French sociate, a pessimist, desn’t Wars, Society of the Friends of the blacks. He wrote a set of rules for the Society of the Friends of the blacks, which detailed the reasoning and goals behind the organization, along with describing the injustice of slavery and put in a statement calling for the abolition of slave trade.

As the first step to true abolition, Condorcet was also a strong proponent of women’s civil rights. He claimed that women are equal to men in nearly every aspect and asked. Why, then, should they be debarred from their fundamental civil rights? The few differences that do exist are due to the fact that women are limited by their lack of rights. Khan Dorsett even mentioned several women who were more capable then average men’s, such as Queen Elizabeth and Maria Theresa part 9 civic duty for condo jets.

Republicanism, the nation needed enlightened citizens and education needed democracy to become truly public. Democracy implied free citizens and ignorance was the source of servitude. Citizens had to be provided with the necessary knowledge to exercise their freedom and understand the rights and laws that guaranteed their enjoyment. Although education could not eliminate disparities in talent, all citizens, including women, had the right to free education in opposition to those who relied on revolutionary enthusiasm to form the new Citizens.

Kahn Dorset maintained that the Revolution was not made to last and that revolutionary institutions were not intended to prolong the revolutionary experience, but to establish political rules and legal mechanisms that would ensure future changes without revolution. In a democratic City, there would be no Bastille to be seized, public education, red form, free and responsible citizens, not revolutionaries part 10 evaluation.

Rothschild 2001 argues that Condorcet has been seen since the 1790s as the embodiment of the cold, rational enlightenment. However, she suggests his writings on economic policy voting and public instruction indicate different views both of Condorcet and of the Enlightenment. Condorcet was concerned with individual diversity. He was opposed to pro to utilitarian theories. He considered individual independence, which he described as the characteristic liberty of the moderns, to be of central political importance, and he opposed the imposition of universal and eternal principles.

His efforts to reconcile the universality of some values when the diversity of individual opinions are of continuing interest. He emphasizes the institutions of civilized or constitutional conflict, recognizes conflicts or inconsistency within individuals and sees Moral Sentiments as the foundation of universal values. His difficulties call into question some familiar distinctions, for example between French, German and English, Scottish thought and between the Enlightenment and the counter and lightened.

There was substantial continuity between conduct, Jeff’s criticism of the economic ideas of the 1760s and the liberal thought of the early 19th century. The Lycee Condorcet in the rue du är and the 9th arrondissement of paris is named in his honor as a streets. In many French cities, special characters in this article was substituted with audio cues. They were denoted as follows, and beginning and ending single or double quotations and left and right for emphasis.

This recording as a derivative work from Wikipedia for more information to Commission recordings like this and to support the developer. Please visit http://www.Potterybarn.Com for


 

Categories
Online Marketing

dotCSS 2014 – Harry Roberts – 10 Principles for effective Front-end Development

Now I know this is um dot CSS. So I should really be talking about some hardcore sass, or maybe some really intricate CSS architecture. But one thing I’ve learned is that it’s really important every now and again to just leave our tool to learn, step back and take a much broader view of what we do.

So that’s why I’m speaking about these principles, they’re personal principles of mine – these are things that I do when I work and every bit of work I do, regardless of the technology, the stack, the tools I use tries to follow these principles. They’re very new. I’ve never shared these before. So if it interested to see what people think, but that’s I kind of that’s kind of thing, I’m going for today, less about tooling more about approaches so yeah, my name is Harry.

I’m a consultant web developer. That means that I spend a lot of time with a lot of different clients. I travel around a lot and learn about everybody’s problems. I’m like a developer therapist in doing this. I’ve realized that it doesn’t matter what stacks our company uses. It doesn’t matter what which preprocessor they’re used. They always have similar problems that can’t always be solved by specifics, and it’s really important to know specifics.

It’s good to know, flexbox why it’s valuable to know about SAS, it’s very, very valuable, to know different technologies, but specifics aren’t always that transferrable. One thing I’ve learned in the last few years, especially working for myself as a consultant, is that code is actually only a tiny, tiny part of what we do think about what you do. In your your day to day life, you might deal with clients, you might spend a lot of time discussing compromises with designers.

You might spend a lot of time explaining why things can’t be done to project managers. The actual code you write is a tiny, tiny part of your drug, so I think it’s important to realize that you know focuses, should shift and mind shifted a few years ago and much much for the better. I found that on a more effective developer, by ignoring the specifics and trying to focus on principle LED approach to development.

The interest is now anyone’s thoughts on this. So if you want to tweet during this talk, I’d be really grateful, so I’ve just 10 CSS will do. I know it says you know, principles for front-end development, but I only really write CSS. So all of these principles I applied directly to CSS start off with an easy one. The simplest option is usually the best. I got Hugo who’s speaking a little later to do some translations.

For me, if they’re wrong, it’s his fault, the simplest doctrine is usually the best. This seems quite obvious right. Let’s start with an obvious one. The simple option is probably the cheapest to implement the quickest and cheapest option to implement will be the simplest one. This is good for business and we’ll talk about business in a second that’s another one of my principles, but quick and cheap to implement is really valuable and it’s also easy for other developers to inherit.

When you pick up a system from someone, it’s really complex and over-engineer, that’s a horrible thing to try and work with, so always err on the side of simplicity. If you’ve got two or more options, two or more solutions to a problem, all let’s try and pick the simplest, it’s less likely to break it’s probably more robust. It’s just locks easier to work with also lessens the amount of cognitive overhead when working with a system.

It’s a really horrible thing to have to try and remember every moving part in a system which leads men to the next bit, always try and reduce the amount of moving parts in a system as a developer. It’s very easy just to do as you’re told, or it’s very easy to build the features that have been requested. I think it’s really valuable to say no to a lot of things. The best code is no occurred at all, so it’s a really good exercise for developers to get rid of unnecessary stuff.

Anything that could be removed from a project try and get rid that could be features in. I could be telling a client that you know we don’t really need this feature, let’s get rid of it or it could be actual lines of CSS. It could be reducing a 20 line mixing down into a single helper class right. Removing the amount of moving parts is a really valuable exercise. Every moving part in a system is a potential thing to go wrong.

It’s a potential point of failure. Everything you add to a system introduces the risk of something going wrong. It’s easier to men attained a system with fewer moving parts. I think it’s a really valuable exercise to get rid. The third principle understand the business now. In this context, the business could mean a few things. If you work for an agency, the business would be your managers and the client the person funding the project.

If you work in honks, if you work for a starter for a product like Kayla, get the financial times, the business is where you work every day, you’re surrounded by the business understand the business makes you a very valuable developer. It’s important to understand that every bit of work you do has a cost and a value associated with it. Try and understand the financials. I don’t mean you know, learning what your colleagues salary is, but perhaps knowing what the company charges you out on for a day right.

It makes you much more effective understanding. The cost and value of your work means that you can make very very informed decisions about what you do for the good of the company. Don’t waste other people’s money. I like to also make you a much more valuable developer. Imagine a company looks like this and you’re just a developer, you’re, not better than anyone else, you’re, no cleverer, no more important anyone else and unfortunately you’re, probably quite replaceable.

If you look around you right now, there are hundreds of people in this room who all do similar jobs so being a regular developer. Who just does their bit of the the task, isn’t necessarily a very valuable developer to have. It sounds really cruel, but I do believe it’s true um, so, instead of having this position within a business, try and have this position trying to connect yourself with everyone else’s problems, understand the cost and the value of your work.

It makes you much more valuable principle. Number four care, laughs and care appropriately. Another thing I learned in especially my time working in big companies. No one cares about your kurd more than you do. Your client doesn’t care if you’ve used SAS or less the business doesn’t really care. If you used an inline style or not, don’t stress too much about your own work and pick the right battles for everybody else, there are a lot more people working on that team than just you.

When you have. Whenever you have discussions, you have to balance everybody else’s needs and wants remain objective. When you do this care less about your own work and care about the good of the team, the stakeholders there’s a much bigger picture out there. The bigger picture looks something like this: we have the user, the person who needs the product you’re building the team. That would be you and your colleagues, designers developers, your solutions, architects, UX guys and then there’s the business.

The person funding this project. Now I’ve worked with a lot of developers who think in this degree they think about the team. They make decisions for the team. They want to use a preprocessor, because this is one we want to use good developers a bit like jugglers. Good developers will think here. The overlap, but great developers think about everybody else’s overlap. Great developers are very unselfish people, and I’ve found this in working with different companies that the most productive teams are the people who make sacrifices themselves for the good of everybody else, so care less about your own work and care more appropriately about everybody else.

The fifth of the ten principles – pragmatism, Trump’s perfection – it’s better to have good enough working today than it is to wait for perper for perfection tomorrow, get things alive. You’ve always got time to make things better. Perfect is a real real sort of misfire on the web. Anyway, think about all the different browsers devices network connections, we will never achieve perfect, so it’s not there’s no point even trying.

I worked with a client who delayed a release by nearly two weeks, because the color of the nav highlight was wrong. That’s insane! That’s! That is a you know, that is a very soft edge case thing to happen, but that’s expensive missing out on potentially two weeks of new signups, because the nav was slightly the wrong. Color is expensive users, don’t care if they’re now slightly the wrong color, because they never saw the PS DS, pragmatism, Trump’s perfection, something hacky that works today is better than something perfect that might work next week.

Never hold yourself back in the pursuit of perfection because it just slows teams down thinker, product level right. Some of these principles seem fairly interconnected. So this is a little like think about the business, but thinking up product levels, a really valuable thing for a developer. To do there’s a very sort of old but harmful view that as CSS developers, it’s our job to build PS, DS and that’s really harmful, because that’s not true at all.

We’ve got to think about the performance of occurred base. We need to think about the maintainability. The velocity of the team we’ve got a lot more to worry about than we realize so try not to put yourself in a bubble and figure out the entire product you’re in a very, very valuable position if you’ve started understanding the business and you’re a developer. So you understand the technology, you can make great decisions for that product.

True story. I once worked a company where a simple UI decision that I made save that company hundreds of thousands of pounds – it’s too long, a story to get into now, but you want to hear it over a beer I’ll. Let you buy me a beer, but yet we’ve got a profound ability to, in fact affect not in fact affect entire product. Use that wisely do what’s right for everyone. Seven do not design systems around edge cases.

I encounter this one quite a lot. Basically, don’t let the minority lead, the majority do not bet your entire product around statistical outliers or another example. For you, I worked with a company that was making a mobile website a mobile web app. They needed a spinner right, a little loading spinner. Now we had to accommodate a really old flavor of Android and a really old flavor of blackberry.

Now the Android didn’t support CSS animations and the BlackBerry didn’t support CSS and CSS animations or animated gifs, so the team spent nearly a month building a spinner that worked in every single browser. It was a combination of sprites, some horrible JavaScript and its really clunky and a really bad rendering performance, and this spinner went out to a hundred percent of our users. So, even though I only needed to be given to a small fraction of a percentage, this spinner went out to everyone.

Designing systems around edge cases is a really expensive thing to it can hold the quality of the product back solve every edge case as an edge case. Don’t let it leak in and influence the entire build of a system number eight another. Quite specific one. Don’t make decisions based on anecdotal evidence, another true story: I worked with a company who they really should have been using a preprocessor.

They had a big, a big UI and it would have really benefited from using SAS, and I got that I asked them. How can we don’t use SAS and the response was? Oh someone told me that variables don’t work very well in SAS. Well, of course, they do. Tens of thousands of people use sat every day, of course, variables working SAS. Did you not think to try this out yourself and they hadn’t they hadn’t fought to run their own tests.

They trusted a story. They trusted some box. I never trust stories, always trusted data. It’s very expensive to ignore the numbers. Another example you’re going out to eat a restaurant and you find a hundred five-star reviews for this place, and then you see one two-star review. You will obviously ignore that two-star review. The two-star review is a statistical outlier, get rid of anomalies, always trust numbers try and avoid trusting anecdotes and stories.

The ninth principle don’t build it until you’ve been asked for it. It’s really tempting, especially as a CSS developer, I’m speaking personally here to over-deliver. It’s really cool to say: I’ve made this mix in which does this, but if you pass in this parameter it does this. The problem is no one’s asked for that. So I’ve spent the business as money. I’ve made something that I haven’t paid for. I’ve spent an extra half day, sugarcoating some some sass, no one’s asked for that, but someone’s paid for it right.

So it’s a rephrasing of yeah. You ain’t going to need it. The the programming software engineering principle and it’s really valuable to try and follow it, can be harmful because you have the cost of the initial work upfront. If someone hasn’t asked for a feature, don’t build it because you’re spending someone else’s money, but also it can influence the rest of an entire project. If you build something now that has a certain dependency on a third-party library, your product is now hooked into that dependency.

So it might have a knock-on effect with future features. You want to add um and yet maintaining things that no one even wanted. Imagine having to tell your manager that I had to bug fix something, or what did you have to bug fix? You don’t really know about it, cuz, no one asked for it, but I built it anyway, and I’ve spent two days fixing it it’s a very unwise, irresponsible approach to building websites don’t build anything until you’ve been asked for it solve every single problem.

Only when you encounter it, you might be well aware that you need to support international ization in six months time. Do it in six months time, don’t do any work ahead of time expect and accommodate change. If this is the one thing that any sort of large-scale site developer should always try and do expect and accommodate change, I’ve been doing this long enough to know that clients will throw you a curve ball.

The business will make unusual decisions. Users will request odd features. Everything is subject to change, so expect it and accommodate it. Every bit of code you write, make sure you can undo it next. You can reverse decisions, keep yourself free to change direction, never tie yourself down, never put yourself into a corner. You can’t out of everything. Is subject to change so at least accommodate that, and you can use this as a really good way to just lessen the stress.

I get a lot of workshop attendees asking me: oh, we really struggle to find the right name for something. You know we spend a lot of time thing about the right name for something my advice is always pick something now right worry about something that fixes a problem right now, because they’ll probably change anyway, don’t try and predict the future always make make sure that you Can change direction, undo things and modify decisions that were made months ago because you’ll thank yourself in the long run? So just a recap, my ten principles, my 10 personal principles for effective front-end development, pick the simplest option.

It’s the quickest and the cheapest to implement it’s the easiest one to maintain its own, that’s least likely to go wrong. No one appreciates over-engineered kurd a website is not the place to show off, reduce the amount of moving parts, remove the amount of moving part from a system so that it’s more robust, more things going on in a system means more things that could potentially go wrong. It’s a really good exercise to develop as a developer, to build less.

The best code is no code at all. It’s the fastest. It’s the most robust. It’s the easiest to debug. Understand the business be aware of the fact that everything you do has a cost and a value associated with it be responsible with other people’s money. It makes you a better developer in terms of actually writing CSS, but it also makes you more employable more valuable. Member of the team, if it can be less selfish and spend your employees money wisely, you will get more effective products off the back of it and they will appreciate that work, care less and care appropriately.

When no one cares about your CSS more than you do. Stop being enclosed in a bubble and think about what you can do for everybody, pragmatism, Trump’s perfection, don’t be the guy who holds back, or at least for nearly two weeks, because the nav is slightly wrong. It’s expensive! It’s unwise and it doesn’t help anyone hacking something together. That works today is better than having something perfect in three weeks time: thinker product-level, the knowledge you have of the product you work on allows you to make very profound and far-reaching long-lasting decisions.

Do not design systems around edge cases? Do not let the minority influence the majority of your product, always design solutions to edge cases as edge cases themselves. There’s no point weighing down the entire product to cater to a minority. Good example would be if five percent of your revenue comes from ie7 users do not spend twenty five percent of your time accommodating those users it doesn’t make any sense.

I don’t make decisions based on anecdotal evidence. Anecdotes are, by definition, edge cases. Their stories always trust data, don’t build it until you’ve been asked for it. It’s tempting to build cool things before anyone needs it, but that adds blur to the codebase. It could always go wrong. You might have to maintain that for the next two years solve every problem as and when you encounter it and finally expect under comedy change.

You know full well that clients make weird decisions. They will change their mind. The business can change, focus and direction every bit of CSS. You write every bit of code. You write should facilitate that. Never tie yourself now, never put yourself into a corner, and that is me saying. Thank you very much for listening.