Categories
Online Marketing

UI Elements at 60fps (Progressive Web App Summit 2016)

I kind of wanted to put that into a little bit of context when we talked about performance historically on our team. Last year year and a half we’ve talked about a thing called rail and rail stands for response, animation, idle and load, and it’s a way of thinking about performance that puts the user in the middle and lets us figure out what they expect from things.

So, for example, if you tap on a screen, you expect something to be coming back on screen in under a tenth of a second. If you scroll or there’s a transition, that’s an animation, and we want that at 60 frames. A second idle is a bit of a funny one, but the general idea is that you should do work when the user isn’t interacting and when there’s opportunity to do so when the main thread has some time and we do those in 50 millisecond chunks.

So we can keep responding to users and loading. You want to keep the user on their train of thought, and so you’ve got about a second to get something up on screen, whether that’s from a cache for the network. Now, when we talk about rail, this is the kind of world view. Then I think many of us have today we kind of go yeah responses. Ok, yeah! We don’t need to be lucky, that’s fair enough! It’s kind of important scrolling animation.

It definitely heard that’s a thing and that’s something I want to make sure is good idle. Yeah sure seems good load load, yes, whoo back in the safe, ok load, yeah man, if I can catenate all that good stuff, but here’s the thing this is kind of where we’re thinking of being on people’s home screens and a closer look at that home screen Raises an interesting question which of these is the progressive one up which of these is the native web app? The truth is users don’t care what they care about.

Is that the thing that they tap on works really well and they would never say something: oh wow. It skipped things there you go back would go rewind, okay, nobody ever going to say this, and if they did, it was something ice. That up looks like native. I hope it behaves like it. There you go, they expect it to behave like a native app. They expect your stuff to run. Well, I want to say, behaves there, we go hello behaves for me is like performance, and it’s about.

Does it behave as we expect? Is it do the things that you know and interact with it? Just do the right things right, since that’s the case, I think we can reevaluate rail to look more like back bad clicker more like this, the response part of rail. Well, we expect our responses to be instant like every time instant. So that’s just now more important. Animations yep they’re down there and there we go they’re going up there, because we expect again, we expect instant transitions.

We expect you know scrolling to be super smooth idle. Well now, if we’re doing more work, to make responses and animations good idle is something we’re going to have to be more tactical about we’re going to have to do some work when the user isn’t, and we have things like requests idle callback for that, so idle. Just went up good news, though I think, if you’re expecting somebody to add you to home screen and run your stuff lots of times.

Hopefully, you’re going to have a serviceworker, hopefully you’re, going to be running from a cache and therefore I think load drops down to here. I don’t think it’s unimportant. Don’t get me wrong. You still got to do a good job to get that first load there, but I think over time I think that’s what we’re talking about so, if you’re being home screen minded. I think it looks more like this and I think, if you think about the the native apps, that you run, you have a similar expectation.

You don’t ever sit there thinking about well, this APK took a long time. You know when you’re using it for the 50th time you’re thinking more about how this actually behaves, whether it’s got the features you want and so on. So with that in mind, I wanted to talk about three individual components, but they give me an excuse to talk about about a bunch of other things and I can explain, I suppose, the way I categorize my components from deterministic.

We know up front. We can hard code the values, those animations and interactions through something that’s a little bit less known upfront all the way through to something where we’ve got no idea about how it’s going to behave until somebody actually clicks on the thing, or we have a little bit Of an idea, but not much so those three components are a side, nav some swipeable cards and then expand and collapse view, let’s jump straight into the side navigation, which I think most of us I’ve seen before seen these you ever seen these quite a lot.

So what, although, for each one of these I’ll, explain the theory of how I would approach them to maintain performance and to kind of be performance minded? I will be leaving probably some glaring omissions in the area of accessibility, but just as well Bob Dodds coming on next and he’s going to talk about accessibility. Oh it all fits together wonderfully anyway, the theory for the side nav. What we’re going to do is we’re going to pop on a containing element over the top of all our content, into which we can place a semi-transparent black, a background to obscure our content and then we’re going to have this contents bit with our actual side.

Nav. In it, which will slide in from the side like so so, the CSS for something like that for that containing element, it’s going to be positioned, fixed left:0, top:0 width and height 1 %. Some people like to do write 0 bottom 0. That’s fine works just as well overflow, hidden because we don’t want any scroll bars, but the pointer events. One is a bit of an interesting side step that I want to take it lets me talk about something that’s kind of like a primed element, so these are elements where you you want that thing to be ready to go, and the sign now is one of Those because, when a user taps on the button, they expect the side nav to just come throughout right.

So the general idea behind a primed element for me is that it’s something that could be activated at any time: okay, like a side, nav yeah, it probably fits that bill and if you were to toggle its visibility, it would take more than 100 milliseconds, as in Because they’re, probably at a tap a button and you ray’ll, tells you you’ve got 100 milliseconds to respond if you take longer than that, it’s going to feel lucky.

So these are my sort of two criteria. As I say, I’m leaving a glaring omission where’s. The regards accessibility so hold on to your hats for that bit coming next, but all the same we have around on. I think this is a primed element. I think it fits and as such we can take a couple of shortcuts, one of which is we’re going to promote the content bit to its own layer and, if you’re not familiar with layer promotion.

The idea is, you want to separate out an element from the rest of the page so that when you paint it or move it around, you don’t affect any other element on the page. It’s the same kind of deal. Is you know if you are not packaged whatever you create a layer and you can mess with the pixels in it and you don’t mess with anything else now? The easiest way to do that today, to create one of these layers called a compositor layer, is to use, will change transform.

So if you imagine the simplest possible page with a photo of bald idiot and a nice guy – and you put will change onto said image now, you can move it around with a transform and you can see that it’s kind of separate from the page. Obviously, this isn’t happening in real time, but it’s it’s the idea of separating these things out now you may be sitting there thinking that seems like a great idea star.

Will change transform burn that from your mind? Okay, if I’m not clear, don’t do it! The reason you don’t wan na do it is twofold. Firstly, you’ll want to keep your memory usage down, especially on a mobile device. If you create layers you’re going to use memory, you’re going to have management you’re going to have textures on the GPU all that kind of stuff, so you want to do this as needed now with the primed element, I’m going to make the argument that you probably Want to do something like the will change in your CSS, but in other cases, where it’s not known until you start interacting, you probably do the will change in your JavaScript.

The other reason is you want to keep your time in compositing to a minimum. Compositing is where we take all those layers and we squish it back together and put the pixels up on screen now, of course, if you made lots of layers, that’s a lot of depth, sorting, it’s a lot of management, and it’s a lot of putting back together That takes time, so you want to be tactical about this, so we’ve got our promoted layer and, as you can see in the CSS I’m going to put will change transform on it like so and then come back, then yeah I’m going to transform the contents off To the left, by a oddly specific 102 percent and if you’re curious about that is because I’ve got a shadow, and I just do an extra couple of percent to hide it, cheating, but that’s programming.

You know it’s just cheating right sometimes and I’m a cheat when it comes to programming, I’m very, very, not otherwise, especially not when playing little games with my kids, I’m very fair, never cheap anyway. Eventually, the user is going to tap on a button and that’s going to show the side nav, which in this case is just going to add a class in that class, is going to remove that 102 percent fairly straightforward.

And we get something like this, where it slides in from the side that semi-transparent black black background is the same kind of deal here. We’re going to do a will change of opacity from an opacity value of 0 to an opacity value of 1 and getting rid of it like so it’s just going to be the same in Reverse, we’re just going to remove that class. Everything goes back. It’s great and we could just do that, but it’s like hide side nav, which I put on the containing element.

So if you click anywhere, I’m going to hide the side nav, which is a bit bad, if you actually click on something in the side nav. So the way to get around, that is, to just add an extra handler for that particular situation, which cancels the click which is just a stopped propagation, so I’m kind of canceling the click and it works out really well, in fact so well, this is what it Looks like in reality, this is one that Surma and I built.

This is actually running on a nexus 5x and you can see you know slide out slide in. I actually added a bit of drag thing to it, which you can see if you want to afterwards. When you take a profile of this in the dev tools timeline, which is kind of what you want to be doing with all your UI elements, I have the side nav sliding in and sliding out, which doesn’t look very big. So, let’s zoom in you can see that green chunk is the frames per second and we’re hitting a nice comfy 60 frames a second on our Nexus 5x and below.

It is the amount of work frame which is pretty low because we’re not doing much we’re just using transform changes if you’re interested in seeing that actually being built for real there’s the TL DW and is also a live stream, which was about an hour long with Me and Surma, where we built the side, nav books and everything it was great, but you can catch that if you, if you haven’t seen it so, let’s move on since we’ve done the essentially done the fully deterministic hundred and two percent, nothing.

We can move on to this swipeable card, which is a little more interactive, a little more dynamic. So that’s this one you’ve seen it probably some that Google, now you know just ours and it slides up to take its place. The theory here is again. We want to promote to a layer for the thing that’s being interacted with, but we want to do that on demand. We don’t want to do this one ahead of time, because if you had a lot of cards, that’s a lot of layers and a lot of memory usage, not a good idea.

We also want to use transform and opacity as well, because we’re going to transform this thing off to the side and from a kind of behavioral point of view. If we want it to fade out, because that gives the idea of being dismissed, it’s it kind of something the user would expect now. At this point, I want to take a little bit of a detour and talk about kind of game loopy stuff, which is something that any game developer would be like yeah and it’s extremely useful in this situation.

What we want to do in these kind of cases is decouple our input, which can happen fairly, sporadically and whatever, from the actual rendering and drawing you bit. We should expect from a game because your character stood there. You don’t want to you know you want the kind of game to keep moving, even when you’re not moving the character right same kind of thing. We want this animation to keep going, even when we’re not actually doing touch.

Events, for example, and the way we do that is, we call requestanimationframe for every frame of the interaction and we’ll give it our update function, which you know the nice side effect, gives us a function that we can just call to be like just draw it. Even when there’s nothing else going on now, we’ve got a touch move at the start of the frame. Well, that’s, okay, we’ll just use it will distort its value and we’ll pick it up in the requestanimationframe.

If it comes in a little bit late or it doesn’t come in at all no big deal, we’ll just use the last known good value. If, by some weird weird chance, we actually got two or more well again we’re not doing work per input event we’re the only going to do it once per frame and we’re just going to use the last known good value, that’s good. So this is a model that you probably want to adopt. If you haven’t already for this kind of work now we get to the actually to adding the event listeners and fair enough, I’m going to share them between Mouse and touch.

I think pointer events might help a little bit here, but you know I’ve got this so touchstart touchmove touchend, so on and as a side note, the adding of these touch handlers to the document is bad. Generally speaking and the reason it’s bad is this: really? You have on the compositor thread, which gets the user touch. It’s the one that actually is told about the interaction first and by default. It would do something like scrolling.

It would just move the page up and down, but we registered a touch move, and that involves the main thread and if the main thread was busy or our touch move, just ran for a long time. For some reason, then, eventually to come back and the frame will be shipped, but in between that we’ve blocked the user oops. So that’s not as good, and there is a way around this it’s new as of I believe, chrome, 51 and it’s in opera and Firefox.

It’s in development, according to Chrome status, same with WebKit, but this is encyclopedia large, obviously, and I’m not sure about age. I can check with the folks on that team. However, what we do is we add this passive, true to the event listener. One that says is, I won’t call prevent default, I’m not going to do it. So don’t worry about waiting on me in order to do the thing you’re going to do still give me the events and give me the information, but I’m not going to prevent default.

Okay and then the browser goes cool. I won’t block then I’ll just get on with it. That’s great. So, anyway, back to where we were. We have our event listeners and we talked about what they are going to do. For example, we have this card, it’s in the start exposition. So what we’ll do is tapped on it we’ll go to our on start, which is going to basically ask for the position which lie to be paychecks or the first touch.

Events, page X and then we’ll add, will change on it dynamically, which will give us a bit of a hit because we have to create the layer and everything. But it’s probably going to be. Ok. Probably now you actually move your finger across and we have to category in what’s the new position, which is fairly straightforward, it’s the same kind of deal. We just tracked the page X or the first touch events page X and since we know where we were and where we are, we can figure out what the translation should be, such that in our update function.

We can say if you’re dragging the card, your translation is the current minus the start and what we will do is we will apply a transform with that value. Great stuff, that’s going to work, we’re going to be able to slide across. We can change the opacity and the same in the same kind of way, but we now need to think about the next part, which is I’m kind of dismissing the card right or I don’t go far enough and it comes back to the middle so kind of This is the behavioral bit, so if we consider a normalized distance, so it’s at 0.

If it was out to the side, we could say that’s position 1 or back in the other way. That’s also position 1. All we can do is we can come to throat. These thresholds, I put them in 0.35, when I was doing this, you could pick naught point 3, 6 or something else entirely. It’s very exciting. What will I choose today? Who knows that’s web dev, so I put an all point three five and if you don’t know, Pratt’s, not point three, five, I’m going to slide back to the middle.

If you do go past, not point three, five, I’m going to dismiss the card fair enough. Okay, so that’s in the the on end, like so oh yeah, threshold card width times by not 0.35, and it’s is this – is this target x value which we’re going to come on to in a moment it’s defaulting to zero? If you go past the threshold, we’re going to choose, either the card width or card with, depending on which direction you were going okay, and we can pick that up in the the else here, where we say translate x, plus equals target X minus translate X, all Over four and if you’ve been around for a while – and it done this kind of work – you probably recognize this if you haven’t very exciting little one-liner, that is incredibly helpful when you want to do what I call the easiest easing in the world or easy inning Easy takes always takes this form.

Okay, it’s value plus equals target value all over strength, and I genuinely have made other developers like memorize that, because it’s incredibly helpful, let me show you what I mean worked. Example. Let’s say you want to get this box from zero to a hundred and you basically target value. So it’s 100 zero all over strength, which is four we’ll move. It 25 pixels cool on the next iteration. It’s a hundred minus 25, which is 75 all over the strength, which is four, that’s 18 point, seven five and, as you build it up, you’re going to see that it’s going to slow down because there’s a nice kind of slowdown easing feel for this, so that Your box would go mmm sound effects, not included okay.

So that’s this one line, but it’s an incredibly helpful line. It’s either than that users back to zero, which can ease us to the card dismissal point now we need to detect doneness. There’s no better word for what we’re doing here. Is this animation done? Can I say that we’re finished with this? Okay? The way we do that is well, it’s either you go there and back to the middle, fair enough, in which case we can just say.

Are you nearly at the start? If so, yeah you’re probably done I’ll work that’ll get us most of the way there. If you are just reset the target allow the user to interact again. Other one is basically, you slide. You’ve done the slide out to the side like so, and we also know that we’re going to fade out the card. So I mean this is pretty cheeky, but we can just ask: is the opacity really really low if it is it’s nearly invisible? If it’s nearly invisible, it’s going, it’s going going gone and, in fact gone so much that we’re going to remove it from the Dom with remove child like so now that will cause all the other cards to jump up immediately, because the Dom yeah we took our Element until the other ones went full cool, there’s some space, let’s take it, which we don’t want.

We want them to animate. We have this function. That says, is what there’s and it looks like this. You know that kind of slide up there. You go. That’s the thing you want, so what we do is in our animator the cards into position. What we’re going to do is we’re just going to ask for the current card and we’re going to step through all the remaining ones like so and we’re just going to. Basically, push them down straight down by a cards height, so you go back down to where you were.

Please just ignore the fact that we just removed a card. You stay where you are, and then what we’re going to do is we’re going to wait a frame for that to take hold because styles will run after the end of our JavaScript cool and then what we’ll do is we’ll switch on a transition on transforms and We’ll get rid of it and that’ll cause all the cars to go and that’ll look great cool, and then, when we’re done, we can reset the target and in reality this is what it looks like.

This is another one that server and I built again. It took an hour there were bugs weird, so you go slide swipe it’s great. If you have two timeline and you were to take a recording of that again zoom in and it’s actually in two parts, this one the left-hand bit is the car dismiss. What are you doing slides? Don’t do that to me. I maybe it’s me and Jake. Maybe maybe we just there’s something bad going on, I’m blaming Jake.

It was all fine until Jake came on stage and everything broke for him. Interesting coincidence. Yes, so the car dismissal. That’s right there and then there’s the other bit here, which is sliding the card and you see, there’s a little dip at the start and that’s because that layer, promotion of there’s a bit of layer promotion, but the kind of setting up of those card animations did Cost us a little bit so, if you’re interested in nine, you want to see that one built.

What are you doing seriously? Okay, if you want to see that one built there’s a TL DW, there’s an hour-long livestream that you can catch of that one as well. So I football cards right. We can move on areas, I’m just going to stand around here. Okay, the exponent collapse is the final one and it’s the one. That is the kind of fully dynamic one, because you could pick any of those cards. They could be anywhere on screen and okay, in this case, in the mobile case, they might do a full screen takeover, but they might not.

They might just expand a little bit or something like that. We don’t really know ahead of time. We can’t hard-code those values and if we try it’s going to be pretty horrible, so how do we handle this situation? Well, the theory for this one is going to be a little more involved, but that’s fun. When I get something like this from a designer or I do it myself, I kind of read it over and over and over again it’s a thrilling few minutes.

But it’s a useful few minutes because it’ll as you kind of read something over and over again, your brain starts to notice the patterns and the patterns here are in this case. I think that thing is, is getting bigger and it’s moving. Yes, there’s the pink head a bit, that’s fading in, but predominately this is about a movement, it’s getting wider and taller and it’s moving and therefore I would normally go wow that feels like a width, height left in top moment.

Great, that’s probably what I would animate, except that that would be bad and the reason it would be bad is that in every browser you would trigger layout with a purple chunk at the top. There paint and composite layout is basically where the browser says. Where is every element? It’s basically a geometric process. Where is the remote element? Every element, what is its size and so on paint is where we fill in pixels and compositing is where we put the page back together all those layers.

Now, if you’ve got to do that for every single frame, when you might have a reasonable size that Dom you’re in trouble, you don’t want to be able to do under have to do this work on every single frame. Chances of getting 60 frames. A second slim to none – you may have noticed that I use transforms an awful lot and the reason it is their profile is different for an element. That’s got its own compositor layer.

Changing a transform is not going to trigger layout and it’s not going to trigger paint. It should only trigger compositing, which is something that we can probably get done comfortably at 60 frames a second, so this then changes the question to look like this. Can we do that effect with transforms? Can we remap this slow-mo? Can we do that with a transform? Well to me that looks like a scale and it looks like a translation cool.

My approach is called flip all right, so that’s the first last invert and play because there aren’t enough acronyms okay, so I’m adding another one cool, but it’s an extremely useful way to think about the animation. What we want to do is we want to essentially ask the question at room type. Where is the element that I’m interacting with so we record its first position on screen and we do that with something like get bounding, client rect, which is fun to say and has been around since ie for lint.

And it will tell you in relation to the viewport, where this element is its left, its height, its top its right, its bottom, all the stuff that we need to know know what we can do is we can actually snap the element in question out to its Final position, I’m doing this for the class. We could have manipulate the Styles. You could do whatever you need to do so now our card is going to be in its last position like so, and we can call get bounding, client rect a second time.

So now we know where you were now now. We know where you’re going to be that’s cool. That means we can start to kind of figure out our transforms that we might need dynamically. Now there is a word of warning here. Going from first to last is going to trigger styles and layout and the reason it’s going to trigger styles and layout is because the second gets bounding, client rect came after some style mutation.

We said: here’s a new class for you or here’s, some style changes, and then we asked for how wide and how high and where are you on screen and the browser goes. I don’t know you just moved everything hang on. Let me go and figure it out and I’ll come back with an answer and that’s exactly what happens. So you got to bear in mind that there’s the from this first class, I mean you might be sitting there going hang on a minute.

I’r sure you said trigger in layout was bad and I did, but the key is here: we’re not going to do it on every single frame. There are two things we need to bear in mind, one we’re going to do it once at the start, as a set up cost. Secondly, we have rail, which is going to be our friend here, bear in mind the user tapped on a card to get the animation. Therefore, in rail terms there here, we have a tenth of a second in which to respond.

We have a tenth of a second in which we can do some work and believe me, a tenth of a second is actually quite a long time, especially when it comes to this kind of work. It’s great. We should use it and we do so. When it comes to rail and flip, you can typically afford to do a single styles and layout. Pass then seriously one, but that’s cool. That’s often enough and in terms of flip, that’s a good set up time.

You’ll still need it to complete in less than 100 milliseconds, so you kind of have to be aware of how big the DOM is and if you’re able to use something like CSS containment to limit the scope of layout and paint. You should definitely do that and that’s really useful. However, we knew where we work. That was first, we know where we are that’s last and now we can transform. What we’ll do is we’ll just basically apply an inverse transform to take us back to here.

We can do that so first left, you know blah blah blah. Do that with a scale, apply a transform that uses those values. So at this point, we’ve done first last an invert – and it’s like this. So if I was the top on the card Ready, Steady, Go there, you go from the users point of view. Nothing happened. What’s really happening. Is this going first last and then we’re inverting and it feels like a lot of setup cost and it kind of is, but it gives us a huge advantage, because what we can do now is switch on transition on transforms and remove that transform and our card Will just go, we didn’t know where it was bit the stuff.

We didn’t hard code it we just said: where are you going? Where are you now I’ll figure out the transform and I’ll apply it for you, we’ve just most a remaps, something there was width, height, left and top, which wouldn’t have run at 60 frames. A second do something that definitely will hopefully all being well caveat. So because there’s always those if you’ve got some scale changes that are being applied.

They something like text, let’s say, you’re, doing something flipped like when you got something with text inside that might get squashed or stretched. So you might need to move the content to a sibling element so that it’s not affected and then just have faded in or something like that, but a sleight-of-hand. You might need to do that bit of gymnastics, but it’s well worth it like. I said the first to last does involve forcing Styles and layout, so you have to be careful with that, but this is what it looks like in reality there.

This is a little kind of expanded collapse, e-card thing, which you know that’s running on our Nexus 5x, and this screen doesn’t make a look at like it’s. 60 frames a second, but it is, and I can prove it because I’ve got timelines that show it and you can see it I’ll show you it’s great. It’s also responsive design friendly, like I said, we’re going to ask at room time what the first position is and what the last position is.

We don’t we don’t hard-code those values, which means the same animation on desktop, looks like this different position: different sizes, but still the same stuff, and this is what it looks like in timeline – will zoom in again to the top bit, and you see the dip at The start – and you see, there’s a red markers – that’s they’ve tools telling you your frames per second dipped below the comfortable point of 60, but we know that that was the setup of flipped.

That was the first lesson invert, which, on a nexus 5x on this case, was about 40 milliseconds. After that that is a steady, 60 frames, a second afterwards tremendous cool. I get to call this one a day in a moment. Some closing thoughts. You’ve noticed probably that I use will change, and I would suggest that you start doing that. If you haven’t already for elements that you intend to animate, you need to decide.

Is this thing primed? If so, I’m going to probably put the will change into my CSS. If not, I need to do it on demand, probably via JavaScript, but you want to use it sparingly, don’t go overboard. Transform and opacity are your best friends. When it comes to UI elements, running performant ly. I hope in the future to be able to say that you can get away with a lot more and actually we are heading for that world with things like Jeep, GPU, rasterization, CSS containment, lots of really good things that might help us limit the work, and I Mean that we can do more, but for today for the cross browser story, I would suggest that you stick here.

If you find yourself in the kind of dynamic and then something like flip, where you can remap expensive properties calculate your transforms at runtime is very useful. Now follow that’s news to you and you’ve never come across like layout, recalc style or anything here are some links, inbound phones out, don’t worry, you can get the slides afterwards as well. Other phones went down, don’t care anymore.

There’s the Google web fundamentals render performance section complete with Udacity course, which will take you through the same kind of content, very useful to get up to speed. Secondarily, if you want the source code for those elements, I showed you can get that at the supercharge. Do I wish to take you to the github repo? If you want to see me and Surma, where sermo basically spends an hour interrupting me and I try and code it’s like real life.

There are bugs as well. It’s just it’s every time. I don’t when it’s scary, but brilliant and there’s a TL DW, which is like five minutes. If you ever got that on that time right, I need to shut up and move on, but before I do, I just want to say this again. We are hopefully going to be here. This is the first time we’ve been invited to people’s home screens. That is incredibly exciting, but it’s also a huge responsibility.

We need to act like we deserve to be there, and that means taking a user interface work super seriously. The web is ready for us to do that. We can do that today with the tech. I’ve shown that you can. I hope that you go and give it a try, and with that I’ll say, thank you very much. You


 

Categories
Online Marketing

Practical lessons from a year of building web components – Google I/O 2016

Thank you for coming to this 9:00 a.M. Session for the jet lag and insomniacs, and those of you often left from the party last night. So let’s talk about web components. We had a whole bunch of titles. For this talk, it doesn’t actually match. What’s in a program, my favorite was the me Annika school for kids, who went to web component good and do other things good too.

It was rejected and addy osmani suggested Miao Miao pro-tips Miao Miao, which is pretty much what’s going to happen here. So Miao Miao hi everyone, I’m Monica, I’m not Waldorf on Twitter and github in Internet places and officially at Google, I’m an Imagineer and that’s because I get very excited about emoji and I sort of like shout about it into the void that is Twitter, but what They actually pay me, for it is OH emoji, so fun thing about the slide.

I had to use Android emoji and not the Apple ones. It was mandated by legal and what I do is web components and for the four people in the audience. I think, as we did a raise of hands, we don’t know what that is. What components are a standard we’ve been working on so that you can write reusable widgets for the web, so you can make your own fancy parts and give it to people and everybody can use it.

I work on polymer, which is a library that helps you write. These web components, and in particular I write web components with polymer. We have elements like these ones that are like material design. For me elements we also have lemons. I don’t look like anything. We have a declarative, Ajax element that you can put in your page and get super easy, xhr requests and that’s kind of fun. So you might not think of yourself as an element developer.

You might think like you’re, a web developer, you make apps, but if you want to start playing with web components, I think thinking like an element. Developer is really important, so you might only make to make elements for your for your own application, but you’re kind of making them for future. You because future you is going to have to use these elements and if they’re crappy, future use going to have a hard time.

So I’m going to tell you basically all the mistakes I’ve made in the last year of making web components so that maybe you won’t have to do the same ones. So there’s like four things that I thought are kind of interesting about making web components you got to make an API that doesn’t enrage your users, and this is actually kind of interesting. You’ve got to maintain this element once you start giving it out people you got to make sure that’s fast and isn’t like slow like molasses and destroys everybody’s application, and you want to make sure that it’s accessible.

So these are the four things we’re going to talk about. So let me tell you a story in the 90s, we had HTML one and it was lovely and was basically like reading the paper on the internet. Things that you might see on a page were things like links and headers and images. If you were lucky and that’s all it happened, you opened a web page and you read it and I was pretty much it and in 1995 things got exciting.

We got HTML 2 and they Channel. We got three awesome elements, we got input, we got form and we got but and we got select and I think we found button well, input type equals buttons there. So now this meant that like websites could offer you interaction. You can type something in a text box and the website would react to you in some way and the reason why I think this is important is that these are basically like ogee web components.

There are little reusable widgets that the platform gives you and you can put in your application. That’s exactly what a web component is, and since 95, in the 21 years that we’ve had this we’ve come up with a couple of more web web components or like whatever you want to call them. We have article and audio, which are kind of awesome. Canvas is like an enormous framework in and of itself dialog in details, and things like that.

I’r really implemented in all the browsers and a lot of the input types aren’t implemented in all the browsers. So the reason why I’m telling you is that, even though we kind of had web components for something like 21 years, we’re not very good at making web components and I’m going to spend the next like 10 minutes telling you how input is really terrible. Because that’s one of my favorite things to do in life on the other side of the world, we have UNIX and here’s where, like begins to be a little bit of a flame war.

So we’ve had your NIC since the 1970s, and one of the things that UNIX is really good at is making reusable little programs that everybody knows how to use. These are the ones that I just like used, probably in the last week. These are the ones you’ve. Probably used ever in your life, maybe not till knit and lynx unless you’re playing a joke on somebody, but UNIX is really good at this. You use LS every day like if you use a terminal, you use LS every day and the reason why UNIX is so good at it is because UNIX has a philosophy about how to write these super tiny components, commands programs whatever you want to call them, and That’s what we’re going to talk about for a little bit, because, if you’re going to go ahead and right web components, I want you to think of what grep does and not what input does grep is a great example of our useable component.

Input is absolutely terrible. First thing so: yeah UNIX has like 17 bullets in their philosophy, and some of them are super meta, like value developers times over computers, which is great, and I don’t know what that means. But one of the ones – that’s the most popular one – is that your component should do one thing, and this is a hundred percent true of web components. If you build a component, it should be really tiny.

It should do the thing that it says it does and it shouldn’t do anything else. If you look at the cat command cat takes a file from your computer and spits it out to the terminal, it doesn’t try to print it. That’s what LPR is there for it doesn’t try to find a string in it. That’s what grep is there for it doesn’t try to sort it alphabetically, that’s what sort is there for cats takes a file and prints it to the terminal.

Input, on the other hand, has something like 21 types. I think today. Last time I checked, even when it started in 1995, it had eight eight types off the bat, that’s how he started the races and that’s really terrible, because they don’t really have anything in common. These input types others in they allow you to select a value. You have input type equals text ray just like mash keyboards and they appear on-screen.

You have the slider which, like you, drag a ball on a vertical slider and that magically picks a number. You have a color picker that gives you an RGB color. You have the map type, which is basically like an image map and where you click on that image is the thing that gets saved as a value. So again, all of these things they have in common the fact that they have a value. They shouldn’t be the same element.

They don’t even look the same, and then you start like painting yourself into a corner once this is your API that you started with. So here I’m creating input, it’s a by default of type equals text, so it’s an HTML input and because you can type in it – and it has a carrot, you can get where that carrot is and selection start is the property that you do this and then I’r going to change the value, the type to input type equals number I can still type.

I still have a carrot, but now, if I actually try to access that property, I get an exception. It’s not that it’s like a bad value. I literally get an exception. The browser panics this makes no sense from an API perspective. Both of these are an HTML input element. Both of these have the same prototype. They have the same property, and yet, if you access it on some types like most of the types to be honest, selection start just barfs on your console and the reason why this is happening is because input type equals text and imple type equals number should never Have been the same element, they were the same 11 because in 1995 we didn’t have JavaScript, we didn’t have polyfills, we didn’t know how to fall back to a default behavior.

So we’re just like we’re going to put everything in one element and it’s going to have a default value and it’s going to be great, but 21 years later, we’re still paying for these mistakes that we had to do in 1995. Because of what the platform was like, so this is why don’t look at input for API advice, because input makes mistakes all the time another one of the UNIX philosophies is composition.

Programs play very nicely with pro with other programs in UNIX. This happens with pipes, the output of any program can become the input of any program and everything works, magically and beautifully, and the way this works on the web is by sort of nesting elements together. So select is composable like select an option or composable. That’s how you can put elements in a checkbox and you can put in text and you can put in a button and you can put in an input and an image and can what do you think is going to happen here? Does anybody know what actually happens? Yeah, this happens, it’s amazing, so the input gets rendered outside of the select box, we’re not even trying there’s no image and with a button we’re just taking its text value.

This is not a composable element. This looks like it could be composable, and so I’ve had a chance to get it really right and they made a mess of it and the historical reasons here are again because in like 1995, when it came out, are you four on Windows didn’t know how to Draw select, select, combo boxes, otherwise, but 21 years later again we can do better and with polymer we did do better. We made our own select box, we called it paper because its material design and in the drop-down you can put on items.

So you can put in text, you can put in an input and you can put in a button and it looks like exactly what you would expect there is the text. There is the button there’s the lemon. I don’t know why you would put an input in a pop-up menu, but I mean you could nothing to nope nobody’s stopping you if you want to do that and that’s a composable element. So when you’re making your elements think about this, are you expecting to have children composed in there? And if you you, try not to make assumptions about them, try to expect sort of any types in there, because people are going to put inputs in your drop-down menus and you’re going to have to deal with it.

And this one leads me to extensibility, which is the code that you’re writing today should work in ten years from now, unless was written 40 years ago on a platform that is nothing like the Mac that I’m running it now and Allah still works. It probably had to be recompiled, but I don’t think anybody changed the source code dramatically. 20 years ago. We wrote forum and forum is the opposite of an extensible and plan for the future element, because forum only works with the input element and when I say it only works with the input I mean it is literally baked in the parser when the parser gets to The for form element: it only looks for input for elements that have the tag, input and skips everything else, and this blows for us as web developers, because what, if I make a super awesome input now that is like way prettier than the crazy native endpoint.

I can’t put it in a form because the form is going to ignore it altogether, so I have to like start hacking around it and make hidden input so that the form recognizes it. So, in contrast in polymer, we try to like not make assumptions about what sort of things again our element expects. We have the swipeable container, where anything that you put in it gets this like magical, Android, swipe, left or swipe right action, and this means that I can put in divs and I can put in inputs and I can put in polymer elements, and I can even Put in like web components that people wrote without polymer that a lemon doesn’t care, it accepts everything and that’s a really good element, because if it works today, it’s going to work in the same in the same way in like 10 years, when the Dom might change A little bit but the platform stays, but the elements stay similar.

So the point here is like to not make any assumptions when you’re making your relevance – and it’s very so. The way I interpret is that when you create your element, assume that it starts like sort of naked, without anything, it doesn’t have any property set on it. It doesn’t have any children, it’s just like born into the world, and then it starts reacting to things when properties change react to that.

Don’t assume that the properties are already set. If people add content to it, react to that assume that when your element starts up, it has nothing and you have to deal with everything that follows, and that means that pretty much in any way that people are going to use your element you’re going to be Fine, because you pretty much covered all your bases by just reacting to changes – and this also sort of leads me to this conversation about state, because, unlike UNIX and this is where UNIX wins, UNIX programs don’t really have any state, they start up.

You give them some input, they do something with the input and then they die and everybody’s happy, but on the web the input sort of lives there on the page, for as long as that page is open and you’re probably going to type in it, and it Has to somehow remember what you typed in it and that’s it isn’t, is internal state which isn’t necessarily bad, but what what you should do about it is that make sure that if your element changes the state internally, you communicate this to anybody.

Who cares you fire? An event every time this internal state changes and similarly you as a user, should be able to always change the internal state of this element in the same way that the element can do it and guess what guess? What input fails that so input type equals number? It’s kind of a good one, a good element, because in theory it lets you like validate when you type in it. So it lets you type in digits and a period for decimals and like the negative sign in a for exponents.

So it doesn’t. Let me type in Monaca emoji, which is great. I guess so, if I type in one two, three four, the internal value of the input is one two three four. If I type in nothing, the value is nothing, and if I type in junk the value is nothing wait what yeah. So it turns out, because this value is actually invalid. The input is going to secretly reset the value to the empty string, but don’t actually tell anyone.

This is going to do it internally and not fire an event about it and if you start with nothing and you type in junk, you as a programmer cannot detect this change, like nobody has told you that that anything has happened, but you with the eyeballs are Looking at that input and be like look there’s junk in it, you got to do something about it, but as a program where you can because input is like hiding, it stayed away from you.

So don’t do that don’t be input which is pretty much. The like point of the stock never be input, because nobody really likes surprises, like surprises in an API, are the worst they’re like finding that your cake is made out of kayo and not cake, and this is San Francisco. Everything is made out of kale. This is the new tragedy in my life, so remember how I said that the reason why we painted ourselves into a corner with input is because in 1995 we didn’t have polyfills.

We had to somehow have a default type on all these stupid inputs, and the only way we could do it is just jamming them into one object, but now we have polyfills, so we need to deal with polyfills, and the really important thing about polyfills is that If your element expects a polyfill, please for the love of God, do not include that polyfill with the element and here’s the story. So we have an element that uses the web animation polyfill with the web animation spec, which works on some browsers and not all of them.

So there’s polyfills for this and we were like we’re going to be so nice to our users and include the polyfill with this element and everything’s going to be grained you’re going to have a great time and then Chrome settings came around and they’re like. We would really like to use this element on Chrome settings, a page that runs on Chrome and no other browsers. Chrome has the web animation standard implemented, but because we jammed the polyfill in that element, chrome has to actually download the polyfill for something they already know.

How to do on every single page? That’s really great, so they don’t really want to use that element and they hate us for it um. So the moment you include the polyphen in your element, you take that choice away from the application developer. Maybe they want to use a different polyfill. Maybe they don’t even care about supporting Internet Explorer. Who cares? Don’t Jam the polyfill in there you’re not actually helping anyone document it, but it’s required, but let the user take care of that.

So what I hope you got from this last ten minutes is that input is terrible and you should not look at it for any API advice, and that group is kind of really good, because UNIX is actually really good at making this. So if you want to read the 17 full at least 17 bullets of UNIX philosophy, I strongly recommended they’re kind of really interesting and they’re, probably going to make you help better make you make better APs help you make better ApS, got it in the end.

Awesome. So we have an element: we’ve given it to people, it has a beautiful API, nobody hates us for it, and now we actually have to maintain it somehow. So the thing about maintaining your elements and why it’s important is that if you go on NPM and you download a package that hasn’t been updated in two years, this is going to give you like the creepy GPS like if nobody cares about this package – and nobody Is fixing it and I’m probably going to be running with a lot of bugs? This is the same with web components.

If you want people to use your elements, you got to keep your elements up-to-date, because that makes them cool and usable and one way we and polymer do. This is by making sure that we follow semver. Oh whoa, whoa, whoa whoa. That was exciting. We got there Samburu, I get excited with silver all the time, so silver stands for semantic versioning and it basically means that every of the every one of these numbers in these versions actually mean something they’re, not just random.

So the last number on the right here I have a tweet from Dave Mithen who makes fun of semver because no matter how what do you think you’re shipping you’re actually going to break your users. So you know keep that in mind. The last number means that this patch has a patch fix. It has bug, fixes it still backwards-compatible everything is a-ok. The middle one means that you’re shipping some features, but they still backwards compatible.

So if you’re using this version yesterday and then you update and you get the new version, your your app should still be fine you’re going to get new features, you don’t have to use them, but like everything that used to work should still continue to work. It probably won’t because you’ll write some bugs, but that’s a different problem and the first one is a major version. This means you’re actually introducing breaking changes.

So if somebody wants to pick up this new version, they actually have to do a little bit of work for everything to work in their application and there’s two things. I want to tell you about major version. Bums, one of them numbers don’t have meanings. Please do not think that increasing your major version is actually like a marketing ploy, or anything like that. Don’t get obsessed about this all you’re doing is communicating that this version has breaking changes, you’re going to have a bit of a hard time and the second one is just because you can communicate this breaking changes doesn’t mean you should have like really aggressive breaking changes.

Breaking changes are really terrible for your users. They have to do work. They have to like read the new API and figure out how you broke them and figure out how to like make their stuff work again. So I’m Palomar we try to be very deliberate. We haven’t shipped a major change yet because we want to make sure that, like the moment, we ship it. It’s like a write change and it’s going to not be actually very hard for users to update to it so be very deliberate about what you’re shipping.

In a major change, don’t just abuse it because you can’t communicate it. That’s what Ruby does um so now that we have cember, we can tell the users that you know this user. This version is going to break you or not, but the only way we’re going to figure out if we’re actually going to break users is by testing, and this should not be new to anyone. You’re right software, you tested duh, but testing.

Look. What is is kind of interesting, because what components are new, and I found that I had to test things that I did not expect that I had to test the first one is obviously the public API. If you pinky swear that a function exists, you should make sure the function exists and does what it says it should do. Duh umm and I’m trying to click now we’re having great times with this remote. I really like it.

So. The other thing is that you might want to start introducing this idea of like a private API. Javascript doesn’t care, so don’t worry about that one. But if you introduce a convent, couldn’t convention like underscore news private, you get to be responsible for less of that API. Like a lot of your configuration methods or any of like your internal functions, you don’t have to make them public because, if you’re making it public you’re responsible for them, but if you make them private, then anybody who’s using them.

You can be like listen you’re on your own. I told you not to use it. If you really want to use it can’t promise it’s going to be there same polymer, you use, underscores any functions or properties that start with an underscore or two underscores. If it’s a behavior, I private use them at your own cost. I might just delete them for shits and giggles. You should test your accessibility, so element should be accessible and I’m going to like rail on this one in about 20 minutes, but you should also test this.

You should unit test it because you don’t want to break it. We use the accessibility, developer tools. It’s on github under Google Chrome, that’s what this cryptic diagram means and they’re, basically an API that you can run as a unit test and every time you said something like roll on an element. It makes sure’s it like, runs 20 tests and make sure all the Aria labels are set up correctly and tab indexes are set up correctly and your contrast isn’t terrible.

So that’s really good. You can automate them. You should also test the look and feel – and this is where things get interested, because your vending elements that look like something the thing that they look like kind of becomes part of your cart. It becomes part of your contract with the API it with the element user. So I discovered this a super hard way where we had an element. It was a button and I thought, being extremely awesome and I changed the box sizing from content box to border box, and I was like everybody’s going to love this change and I broke like 15 people because it turns out if you change it to border box And somebody was sending a size on that element.

That side is now completely messed up and they’re going to have like adjust everything and add 20 pixels to everything, and I ship that as a bug fix – and it was actually breaking change. Go me and that’s because I don’t have any tests for the UI so make sure you actually test the UI, because you’re promising your user. That a thing looks like the thing. It should look like. Here’s a bunch of UI frameworks and libraries that let you make UI tests, I don’t care which one you use just use, one.

You don’t even have to you everybody’s, taking pictures of these nice. You don’t even have to use this one. You can literally do like get bounding client direct on your elements and make sure that the right size and like the font size, is the same. Do whatever you want as long as you test your and if I don’t remember, I told you, elements are composable and they like should accept children and they should like working other things.

So if your element should be composable and that’s the thing that you care about, make sure that you test it. If you’re writing something, that’s like a form put all sorts of things in that form and make sure it doesn’t crash. If you think is like an input, put it inside a form and see that works, fine test, your things, cool, we’re testing, we have silver, we’re telling the users we’re updating our elements.

Users, trust us they’re delighted with our elements are going to use them forever. We need to actually write documentation about it, um, because if you don’t WTF m, you can tell people to RTS em later so cover your bases. Now, if your element has any edge cases document them, I don’t care that your element is being weird if it’s in like RTL mode as long as you tell me about it, because otherwise, I’m going to write this like super-lonely stock over Stack Overflow post, that nobody’s Going to respond to I’m just going to be sitting there and be like it’s been 10 hours.

Why doesn’t this element work just document your is going to be great, we’re maintaining irrelevant. Everything is great. Let’s talk about performance, so performance has been a big topic at i/o performance. We want fast steps fast, apps, lead to user engagement, lead to more views, leads to me getting promoted and getting paid more. Everybody wants that. But when we talk about elements, performance is actually really important, because if you it doesn’t matter how fast I make my application, I can use rail and purple at everything if I’m building it out of really terrible and slow elements, there’s nothing that I can do, which Means that you, as an element developer, have to make to be very careful about what you put in an element because it’s going to screw somebody in a major way later.

So, if you think about your element, maybe it’s like 1 milliseconds fast. Let’s see it’s a checkbox and it takes 1 millisecond to paint because that’s what we really do, one thing: do it fast duh? So if you think about painting, if it takes one millisecond to paint your element, you might like high-five yourself and be like one. Millisecond is the fastest paint I’ve ever heard of in my life, I’m doing great, but if I have like a thousand pizza toppings on that page and they’re, all checkboxes you’ve now added a whole second to that page and a whole second to a web page is Actually enormous we’ve been trying to like save milliseconds out of pages, and you just made it so much slower, so focus on first paint and make sure that the first time your element shows up on the page is as fast as I can possibly be.

Steve are well on the polymer team. Has an amazing rule about this? The best to advise about how to make your element be fast is do less and be lazy. This applies to like any, that you want to be fast, do less be lazy? By do less, we literally mean that don’t do anything, you don’t need before. First paint, don’t like said magical handlers, don’t set magical Styles that are needed maybe later so we had this code a lot in a lot of our polymer elements were like when the element was being attached.

So when was actually inserted in the Dom, we were updating the pointer events to make sure you couldn’t click on disabled things, and we are, you know, adding click handlers, and this looks like very reasonable code right. It’s very short. It probably doesn’t take very long to run, but again, if you do it a thousand times, that’s a thousand event listeners you’re setting up before you’re painting the page, that’s enormous.

So what we do now is we wrap it in this like after next render? We do everything that’s needed for paint, this isn’t needed for first paint and everything that’s needed, like literally the tick right effort painted we do it after the next render – and this is really great because now my page paints really fast. My elements paint really fast and they’re interactable the milli site like instantly right after so everything is perfect and everything is fast.

Be lazy. Take sad one step, one step further, don’t do anything unless somebody acts chillie asks you for it. Don’t just like volunteer to do work, that’s bonkers! You would never do that in real life. I have nothing to do right now. Let me do some work. It’s great you’ll read Netflix. You know you do so in polymer. In polymer, we have a lot of polymer elements: they implement the material design, spec and the material design.

Spec. Has this thing where, like every time you click on something has like a really satisfactory poll that is a little jiggle and everything’s, really nice and fun. So the way we were coding it up is that literally every element had a ripple element inside of it check boxes buttons inputs. Everything had a ripple which sounds really great in theory, right like it should ripple, we should put a ripple element in there.

It turns out that’s crazy. Let’s go back to my pizza, topping analogy. I have a thousand pizza toppings, I’m probably going to click on like four of them, because I’ve tried to put all the pizza toppings on a pizza before and it is terrible. Don’t do it pineapple and mushrooms don’t go together. They go together with onions, though so, if you’re only going to like click on three things, you only need three ripples you’re now creating like 997 ripples.

You don’t actually need so we update our code and we do something else that where no element has a ripple when it starts up, but if you click on it, the first thing is going to do on that clicking will be like do. I have a ripple. No well, here’s a ripple make it jiggle. So now, in this enormous application, we’re only creating the ripples, we actually need or being incredibly lazy – and this makes everything super fast because I’m not just creating Dom nodes that are sitting on the page.

Doing absolutely nothing not even giving them access to Netflix do less be lazy, do less be lazy. This is your manager tattoo it somewhere and we didn’t just like come up with us one day. Well, Steve did he woke up he’s listening to like this weird podcast? I think that tells him that, but like we actually started writing tests for performance to figure out how this was going and there’s many different ways in which you can test performance and they’re all terrifying, because I’m actually terrified of everybody else’s frameworks.

So I have like two simple ones that I use and they work really well. The first one is console dot time so cause the whole time, takes a label and basically like between the first time. You call time and time end on that label. It calculates how much time does this cost and you can also nest them, so you can be like well. Creation took this long, but setting attributes took this long and the reason what causes all time is.

Nice is because you get dev tour. You get a timeline in the of tools and you can see like what’s actually happening here. This is incredibly fast because I was just doing random numbers in a loop you’re, never going to get code that runs in ten milliseconds like that, but yeah. So that’s constant load time. It gives you a time line if you’re even lazier than that, and you don’t want to don’t care about that aki-nee’s performance now, which literally just tells you milliseconds now milliseconds now, so you can do it before and you can do it after a task and see How long that took – and I think that you do inside, if you want to test your first paint – is that you want to create your element.

You want to attach it to the body and you want to do a giant hack. So let’s talk about this giant hack in the same way that we’re optimizing our elements, the browser has been optimizing itself because it assumes there were terrible developers which we are so just because you’re appending something to the body doesn’t actually mean chrome is going to paint It Chrome’s going to like wait to batch them.

If that’s the thing isn’t visible, chrome doesn’t even care if it doesn’t affect the layout, it doesn’t care and you can’t actually tell chrome to paint things so the only way we can we can time. This correctly is by sort of forcing chrome to relay out the entire page, which also forces it to paint offset with. Is one of these attributes that when you call it on a on an element, is a style attribute? It like has to recalculate the layout because it’s in reference to its parents, so that’s the one that I use pretty much anything with the word offset in it is going to cause a relay out.

You can Google for all the other ones. If you don’t like it, but the idea here is that, if you want to make sure your element has painted somehow trigger our relay out on the page and the follow up to that is don’t do this once do it like a thousand times, do it as Many times as you have time for, because if you only do it once anything could have happened in there, somebody could have sent you an animated gif to your slack blog, which slows down your computer.

The garbage collector could have run the garbage. Collector could have not run if you do it a thousand times you’ll get more accurate numbers. You actually get a good answer about how slow or how fast your element is at painting, and the reason why this is awesome is that now you can automate it. You can put this in a unit test. You can put it on a test that you run on every merge and then on every more.

You can be like well, this elementals, like 10 milliseconds fast yesterday and itself 15, and then you can ask yourself whether the feature you’re, adding or the bug fix, you’re adding, is actually worth this performance, constant you’re taking. So let’s talk about accessibility, there’s! This amazing quote about so anywho, but the conclusion here, just to like bring it home, is test your elements for performance make sure they are fast.

If your elements are have their ups really slow. I hate you and you’re going to slow down the web. Please don’t slow out. The web is really hard for all of us accessibility. So there’s this amazing quote by Cordelia Dylan, which is that accessibility is like a blueberry muffin. So the way you make a blueberry muffin isn’t by taking a plain muffin and a fistful of blueberries and jamming them in there and be like I made you a blueberry muffin, you made me garbage the way you make a blueberry muffin is by taking the eggs And the flour in the sugar and the butter and beating them together and adding the muffin the blueberries to this raw dough and putting them in the oven and waiting for 35 minutes, and then you get delicious blueberry.

Muffins accessibility is hard. You have to do it. The entire time from the birth of your element to the end of your element, in the same way that you make muffins, you can’t just make an element and the last day before you ship and be like, I didn’t, make it accessible. Let me jam some Eric: are your labels in there you’re going to make a terrible job about it, and the reason why this is important is that if you don’t have accessible elements, you’re not going to be able to make accessible apps? And if you don’t want to make accessible, apps you’re a terrible person, you should have meat making apps for anybody.

You should be doing something else. Thanks y’all Rob Dodson gave a really good talk yesterday at 9 a.M. On this stage about how to make your elements accessible, and I strongly recommend going and reading it at home. It’s an amazing talk and he tells you like proper, concrete things on how to make it better. I’r going to tell you two things that I got wrong because they were like kind of like really easy things for me to get right, and I didn’t focus dates.

Are only a big one, focus dates tell you, you know where the focus is on the page. It’s a really ugly outline that in the 2000s it was really cool to set outline none on focus because nobody really liked it and that’s really terrible, because if you’re not using the mouse and you’re just using the keyboard, you’re not going to know where you’re on The page, but even if you are a mouse user, if it’s just like you, remember the last time you had to buy something on the internet and at the end you get to the 15 field.

Visa credit form where you have to like fill in on your information. Your shipping address your mailing address, your name and your credit card number and you’re going to be tabbing to them. I promise you, you don’t actually click on every single field. I know you and if nobody is telling you where the focus is on that page you’re going to start typing your credit card number in your like address field, you’re going to get frustrated, it’s already frustrating experience buying things on the Internet.

Don’t make it worse, don’t make bad you eyes for people, I don’t care whether you use this outline or a different outline or you’re communicating focus in a different way. As long as you are communicating focus in someone, you can make like a nice ripple around it. Just make sure that if somebody is using the keyboard, they know where the focus is on that page and the platform helps you with this tap index equals zero.

Whatever you put it on, that thing becomes focusable and by default at least it gets the really ugly outline it’s ugly, but you’re doing better than not doing anything at all. And the other thing is that you have documented active element which tells you where the focus is on that page, which means now you can unit test this and automate. This make a test where you have 17 of your elements and simulate tabbing through it, and check that the thing is that the thing that is focused is the thing that you expect to be focused, and it’s styled, like you, expect it to be focused unit tests Are the best they make sure that your element doesn’t randomly break? The platform also gives you Aria.

Aria is what a voiceover application is used to read: HTML, there’s a whole bunch of like documentation. Aria, I’m not going to talk about Aria. I just want to mention that some elements have like built in Aria like nav and a have like extra Aria built in themselves, and that are you labeled by is this really awesome attribute? That is basically like Aria label on steroids, because if an element already has a built in Aria label like input the native input, does it uses the Aria label to read whatever you typed in it? You can’t put an extra Aria label on it.

You can only have one so if you want to make the native input more accessible, like say, with a label that describes what it’s for. Are you labeled wise, therefore, that it always adds more information to any element, so this is really important. Please make your elements accessible, because if we’re going to make accessible elements, we’re going to get accessible, apps and the same thing happens for performance.

If you have fast elements, you’re going to get a fast app and if you have maintainable elements, you’re going to get a maintainable app and that’s really our goal as element developers, we want to make the web better. We want to make amazing apps for other people, so that’s it. I hope you got something out of the stock. Please go home and make elements and if you do tweet them at me, so I can what remained thanks.


 

Categories
Online Marketing

Web Payments (Chrome Dev Summit 2016)

But if you think registration forms are difficult, we should talk about. Checkout forms a lot more form fields, a lot more questions, but I think that you’re going to see a consistent theme emerging through, like our talks here today, which is this one of let the browser help you. There are certain advantages that we have as a browser, especially when it comes to reducing friction and making life easier for users, especially things around repetitive data steps, things that the users can store inside of the browser’s, but we’re trying to do our expose api’s and give You tools to reduce, friction and make things easier for your users.

We saw it in Koreans, while management and we’ll see a very similar theme with what we’re doing in payments, but first a little user activity just before we go off for lunch, which are some questions. Okay, great so first question just curious: how many people here actually enjoy the process of buying something on the web using their mobile device? Okay, good yeah and some people, but by large? No and whether we should come talk.

I’d love to hear like what is that you’d like about buying things on the mobile web and what it is that you don’t as much a second question, and I would be really impressed here how many people can remember all the details of their credit card. I’r talking full 60 digit number really CVC on expiration. Okay, it’s more than I expected. I got to be honest, like okay, we’re still like under 15 %, but okay cuz I’ve even payments out for like 18 months, and I think I have yet to remember a credit card number, that’s great and then okay final question: how many people enjoy the process Of handing over all their sensitive credit card information to a random third party server I’ll get one.

It’s almost like. I’r asking these questions to lead up to a particular point, and – and there was a points and the reality is that most users finds payment difficult. They find it insecure and scary and frightening and they find the process of doing it on the mobile web, particularly bad, and so we had this number. We talked about it at i/o as well, and it hasn’t really changed, which is that on average, we tend to see about 66 percent fewer conversions on mobile than on desktop and again we think there’s an answer to that, which is all around again high.

Friction the difficulty and issues around trustworthiness and security, and so we’ll talk about sort of how we’re addressing those today and how we’re trying to bring fast, simple and secure payments to the web platform. But this is a little I’m a p.M. It’s a little bit too PME for me actually, and so I have a much better mission for us inside of the chrome team, which is we’re trying to save the world from annoying check out forms.

So I’m trying to save the world from virtual keyboards and having to memorize and all of those terrible things. I actually started this joke of the better payments Bureau a couple of months ago, and now it’s become like a thing so anyway, but actually Chrome has been fighting the good fight against annoying check out forms for many years. Actually, we start with autofill back in the day, you guys are probably familiar with autofill.

This is my one slide on it. It’s not really the topic today, but consider this. My 10 second plea to say: if nothing else leave today and set autocomplete types on your check out forms. It helps us it helps. The users helps the browsers and it basically ensures a hundred percent accuracy on autofill. I’r not here to talk about that today. I’r really here to talk today about payment requests, which is this new API that we’re building for the web to really help solve a lot of the problems I’ve been talking about.

But before I talk about what payment requests is I want to talk about what payment request isn’t and that’s, because payment is complicated. There are a lot of players in this space and I just want to sort of set up fronts and sort of help alleviate any confusion. So the first thing payment request is not a new payment method, so we’re not trying to create Chrome pay or browser pay or yet another X pay button on your website.

That’s not fundamentally our goal. Our goal is to help users pay, that they went the way that they want to pay and do it quickly and efficiently. Secondly, we are not trying to become a gateway or a process or or some entity that literally moves money in the ecosystem. So it’s not we’re not trying to step on any toes here or like enter into this ecosystem. We think that the market has actually done an incredible job here.

Already players like stripe and Braintree and others have done a really stellar job over the last couple of years of taking the incredible complexity of accepting online payments and making it really simple. They’ve removed the burden of things like acquiring banks and all the couples of PCI, and they put it all into a easy-to-use API. And so our goal is to ensure that whatever we do plays really nicely with all these gateways and processors.

But that’s not fundamental goal to become one. The thing about all these great new services, though, is that they’ve really focused on developers, which is great they’ve made your lives easier and it made easier for you to accept payments, but the user experience has largely remained the same. You have to go from the state where you know nothing to a user to everything and formfields tend to be the way that we do this.

So payment request was fundamentally built for users. I mean we think it’s pretty good for developers too, and it’s pretty easy and we’ll sort of talk about code samples. But fundamentally, like my goal, I think about users and how I can help them and help them get through these burdensome flows on mobile, faster and more efficiently. So what exactly is payment request? Well, pay requests, like I said, is a new standards-based, API and standards-based.

I want to emphasize that we joined the web payments working group almost a couple years ago now and every major browser is a vendor. We have financial institutions from around the globe and we’re trying really hard to build something that everyone can integrate, that all forms of payment integrate with and all browsers can do so that users on a variety of devices and ecosystems can continue to leverage and have the Benefit of it, we’re just in the early stages of it and sort of will talk about where we’re at, but that’s sort of fundamentally our goal, and so when we started to think about what design this API looked like.

We had two high-level goals in mind and they sort of reference back to my original question set the first one is we to build a seamless, easy-to-use, checkout experience on mobile? In particular, we wanted to make sure that users like could minimize typing and minimize friction as much as possible, and the second thing is we really want to bring more secure payments into the web platform. In many ways like the web is one of the the last places where it’s very commonplace to exchange over all of your sensitive information to some unknown third party, and even though there’s an answer to this from the payments community.

With regards to tokenization, the web really didn’t have a great answer for that, which is why we’re really excited that we’ve brought Android pay into the web platform and again we’ll continue to expand that. But this brings tokenized forms of payment. So in the events of data breach or other problems, you as a users are protected, but also it also reduces the burden for for you, as developers and merchants, and so those are our two high-level goals that we had and again the idea here, just at a High level is that, if you think of your traditional checkout flow, it looks something like this.

It’s you know anywhere from like two to five pages, maybe one for single page things and you have somewhere between like 10 and 40 form fields where you’re asking a variety of questions. Things like what’s your name, what’s your shipping address, what’s remail, what’s your phone number? What’s yer credit card number, what’s your expiration and then you have users who are like you know trying to like do all this on their mobile device and at some point they’re, like man and I kind of give up, and maybe they go to desktop later or Most likely, they don’t – and you know and Aaron talked a lot about the growth of mobile right, and so we really think we need to fix this and make this easier and the way this happens with payment requests is you can imagine that the browser sort of Plays this role and and helps facilitate checkout across this, the the highest friction point.

So we take that common set of data, those common things that you request and sort of leverage our strengths to make it easier for users to to be successful. So before I could show you a demo, I want to talk about what types of data is actually supported by payment requests. So the first one is probably a little bit obvious, but it’s a form of payments. So, at the end of the day, you need a way to actually request money from the ecosystem, so it needs some sort of form of payments.

Right now in Chrome, we support we support credit cards and Android pay. I put etc on here, because the is to support more but we’ll talk about that a bit more later, and so you always have to request a form of payment. You can’t call payment requests and not want to form a payment that would just be weird and then would just be request: arbitrary user data API. So the other big thing that we allow you to request is shipping address and shipping options so for physical good purchases.

You can leverage the API to say, hey give me their shipping address and then there’s a dynamic mechanism for you to take that address and then populate shipping options that have updated pricing, etc. You can also request a phone number. You can request a an email address, of course, for like sending a receipt or even prompting sign up afterwards and coming soon, actually, but not quite there, but in a couple of months is payer name support, and these are all flexible.

You can request any of these or none of these, if you want the idea is to support a broad range of of use cases out there. So if you’re like a ride, pickup service, you probably don’t need you. If I don’t need everything, but you definitely need. Let’s say a location like an address and a name, let’s say or if you’re a physical good you may may or may not need their payor name because you’ll get that from the shipping address, so it’s flexible and you can sort of accommodate experiences as as fits Your the business, but the really important point here, is that all of these data points can be stored and returned by the by the browser, so users, by and large trust chrome to store this data.

They trust us to store their names, their emails and even their credit card data. And so the question is like: why put users through the burden of a form that they have to fill out manually and, like you saw like sabine slide about like fat, fingering and the difficulty of mobile keyboard typing and those problems were multiplied across all those form Fields, so if you can save them the burden of doing that, we think it’s worthwhile and sort of payment request is really designed to do that.

But let’s go ahead and just let’s just going to sort of see it in action switch over to a demo here see if we can see all right, excellent, I’m going to you open up, Chrome on stable and I’m actually going to use the exact same shop. Api, that’s, oh and you see it, it auto sign man, you have to love and a good demo goes right, and but otherwise it’s the exact same website, polymer shop demo, except I’m going to go a little bit further and actually just make a purchase.

So I hit the shop now button. You know, I definitely don’t have enough. Google hoodies so I’ll, just source wet shirt, so I’ll just buy it yet another one. So it standard shop. You see that there’s like size and quantity. I won’t affect those, but you see that there’s there’s two buttons at the bottom there’s a typical Add to Cart button, but there’s this also. This Buy Now button that Buy Now. Button is based on feature detection, so we’re checking to see if payment request exists and if it’s there great, let’s leverage it and if not it would.

You would just see an edit card, but I’m going to end use the rapid checkout approach, and so I tap on the Buy Now button and you see that this this payment sheet slides up from the bottom. This is a payment request in action, so you’re looking at sort of natively drawn UI, it’s controlled by us. We can through it, but it’s populated with data from the merchant. So you see that my total amount is there $ 22.

15. I defaults to my form of payment that I prefer, which is android pay. If it’s available only cuz, it’s faster and more secure. You see it they’re also requesting my email address for the purpose of sending a receipt, and the only thing I need to do here is select. The shipping address it’s very difficult to ship, a sweatshirt to someone. If you don’t know where it goes so I’ll tap on that you’ll see that the payment chief slides up to full screen – and it has my addresses, automatically populated for use.

These are our two Google offices here, so I’ll go ahead and shift to the one in San Francisco, where I work, you see that when I do that the shipping options are automatically populated there, and so we have a free shipping in California option or in Express Shipping, and if I change those it will dynamically change the price, so you can see here that express shipping changes, but of course, why would I pay more I’m going to go back to zero? That seems to make a whole lot more sense to me and now I’m ready to pay.

So we just have the pay button and then you’ll see the Android pay screen slide directly up we’re running the test app. So it says unrecognized ooh, you guys wouldn’t have that and because I’ve actually authenticated in the last couple of minutes. I don’t even have to do any extra authentication on Android pay I’ll literally just tap the continue button. A responses comes back and the transaction successful so pay with Android pay, no keyboard, no typing.

All I had to do was tap and select and confirm my shipping addresses so really great, really seamless, we’re really excited about it and just to show you that if you don’t have Android pay available no big deal, we can always change our form of payment and, If I didn’t have Android pay, I would just default back to my credit card, in this case, a Visa card that I have once again I’ll select my shipping address and options.

I hit the pay and the only thing the only keyboard we can’t get rid of is the CVC input everything else we have so I’m going to do one two three. I used to do like a live credit card on this and I discovered that what that didn’t work well for me, so I’ve switched to a demo card but either way the same. The same concept applies, we’ll talk about what’s happening behind the scenes, but this is all client-side basically, so it’s all happening super fast and pretty great they’re really excited about that.

And now maybe we can switch back to the slides and talk more about what it takes to make this actually happen. So how do you leverage payment requests? Well, it’s pretty simple. There are three parts to payment requests, two of which are that are required and one of which is completely optional, and so we’ll talk about them in order. The very first one are payment methods, so we need to know basically all the ways that you can get paid.

This could be a wide variety of things in the future, so it could be. I accept Visa and MasterCard and AMEX and Discover JCB UnionPay. It could be in the future, I accept Ally, pay or idea or PayPal, etc. As long as people are built into the ecosystem, like I said for now, Chrome we just launched so we’re, starting with credit card support, Android pay, and so it looks a little bit like this. So we basically pass in this thing called method.

Data and metadata is an array of objects and those objects. Each have a an array of supported payment methods. So you can see here that Mont. The first thing I support our credit cards. I support the standard for Visa Mastercard, Amex and discover. That’s it nothing else to do it, just as I accept this in the future coming out in a couple of months, we have added support for granularity for things like debit or credit or our prepaid, but for right now, essentially, when you say visa, we sort of Assume you can accept all visa and don’t make a strong differentiation there, but the second one is a little bit more interesting, and this is Android pay, there’s sort of an abbreviated version of this, but to support Android pay.

You see that there’s an additional key inside of that object, which is the data data, is sort of a generic object and it’s a payment method. Specific. The reality is that different payment methods out there have different dependencies different things that you’re going to pass in when you instantiate it by default, so for Android pay, for example, you always have to pass in like your merchant ID, you have to pass in what kind Of token you would like either network or gateway.

We don’t have a full example here, but and then what happens then is when a user chooses to pay with one of those forms of payment, we basically bundled it all up and pass it on to the payment. App so and then the payment app uses that data plus things like origin and assertions from chrome to basically verify that the payment app is the right one, and so the payment can can continue. So it’s pretty simple, but the idea here is that you throw everything you can at the browser for ways that you accept payment.

So if you can accept a like a hundred different ways of paying around the globe, tell us a hundred ifferent ways to pay, because what the browser does is we find that spot in the middle between the set of ways you can get paid and a way That a user can pay you and give a user an optimized experience about the ones that make the most sense for them. So you solve, for example, in the demo that Android pay and a Visa card were available, but let’s say that we had removed visa as an option, then visa just wouldn’t show up, because that doesn’t make any sense and so for, as you go across the globe There are wide variety of ways to pay, but we recommend giving us all to them and then we’ll find the best experience for the user to optimize around their preferences, their defaults and what? What is the best thing for them? The second bit of data is also quite important, so now that we know how I can pay you, we need to know how much money you wants to get paid, and this is what this looks like great.

So the first thing, the most important thing that’s required is this total attribute three parts basic. There are two parts really. The first ones are label, so we customize this. So if you tell us, total will display total, but you this could be like authorization donation. Whatever you want – and you have to, we have to know an amount and the amount is compose of a total amount of money and an underlying currency code.

So we know, for example, or the underlying payment app that we transferred to knows what currency to charge in we’re also to support display items. So, just like I showed you like when I tapped on the total those line items. I came down that basically told you how the total amount was reached this you can’t. We also support this. It’s a wholly optional. You can pass in. You can pass it if you want or ignore it.

We recommend it it’s nice to give a high-level overview to a user about the things that inform the total amount, things like the subtotal tax, shipping, cost, etc. Less of like a full itemized receipt and again in more of like a high-level overview, one important point payment request does not do math we’re not good at floating point math. So if you pass in, you know, you have two line items that sum to five and your total says four like we’re not going to throw anything so you’re totally in control of this thing.

So just keep that in mind and they’re by the way it might be some use cases where it makes sense for those not to a line, but by-and-large just want to point that out. The other point to note is that transaction details can also contain shipping options, and in this case, if you put them in there by default, we support default shipping options. We only recommend you use this if you’re highly confident that your shipping options will not change, then they’re not dynamic.

So if you support, for example, world wide free shipping and it never changes, no matter what the address is feel free to default populate this. But if your shipping is dependent upon a user address, then we recommend waiting until you’ve gotten a user, a user address event which we can talk about a little bit and then you can use that to dynamically query, against whatever service you use to calculate prices, and You can repopulate this and that’s the important point that basically the transaction details object can actually be updated and overwritten throughout the lifecycle of payment requests at certain events and points.

So if a user changes their shipping option, you saw like how, in my demo, when I changed my ship, the price change and the list items changed. That’s because when that event took place, we repopulated those set of transaction details, and so you have that flexibility in control on those events, and so that’s how we get sort of that dynamic pricing model that exists out there and so again don’t do default shipping options Unless you’re highly confident they aren’t going to change and the final piece is the extra information, the optional set of options, and that’s that things I talked about user address, shipping support, name, email and phone all entirely optional, but definitely useful.

I think there was like sort of this myth out there that the the only drop-off point in the funnel is the is the process of putting in your credit card, but really like the entire checkout. Funnel is well a funnel and so like wherever your users. Experience. Friction and there’s a step. Others are drop-off, so we highly recommend taking advantage of these these different pieces, and so there’s a few that we support, like I said, and it’s as simple as passing in just a bunch of boolean’s.

Basically, do I want shipping? Yes, do I want email, yes, etc, and you can again, these can be variable, so you can say I don’t want shipping, but I do want a name and phone number or you can say I just want an email address to send a receipt to. For example, it’s completely configurable and again. The idea here is to support a wide variety of use cases. Something funny that is minor that we have coming soon in the next couple of months is we’re adding support as well for a shipping type value.

It’s pretty simple, but the idea here is that let’s say you are buying a pizza, one does not ship a pizza right. That’s just weird like we deliver pizzas, and so it’s a very minor feature that allows you to actually specify shipping delivery or pickup. As like the address type, so we still call shipping address underlined in the system, but this way in the UI a user would see. Oh, I want my pizza delivered two three four five speed streets.

I don’t want it delivered or if you’re a ride-sharing service, for example, you can say pickup and it’s your pickup address where you’re currently at or located, and so that’s the value of that particular little thing again pretty minor but allows us to just have like a Better user experience underlining the whole system so now we just put it together basically, and we get that whole experience that we talked about, or I just showed you so.

The first thing we do is we instantiate payment requests and we pass in our method data way that we things that we support. We pass in the transaction details again how much money, what currency code, what line items do we once and then our optional options right? So in the case of our demo that I went through, that would be request, shipping, true and request email, true, but again that one’s completely optional um.

You see here. I’ve also added an event listener to my shipping address change and we support two events in the system: shipping address change and shipping option change. These are this: is that dynamic mechanism that allows you to receive the events parse out the new details? Let’s say so: if a user selects a shipping address that event fires, you can actually pull out that full shipping address.

We don’t do just the zip code because you can’t get fully accurate shipping information with just a zip code. So you get a full user address. You can use that at that time to call event update with this basically says: hey, you know browser, I’m thinking. I need to calculate this. You can call your back-end api’s and you can update resolve a promise with new transaction details. So again that updated transaction details object can now contain your updated set of shipping options, including the empty set of options and an error which says like opps.

Sorry, we don’t ship to you know wherever it is that you’re trying to ship to so that’s also supported and so and by instantiating payment request or not. There’s no UI. That shows it’s just instantiation when you want that actual payment sheet to slide up from the bottom. Oh, we called that show that show is actually our signal and we actually raised that payment sheet and put the user through the process.

That returns like a promise, and when that promise resolves you have a payment response and that payment response contains the entire set of data. It’s just a JSON object that contains the entire set of data that you requested so for a credit card. For example, you would know what the underlying network was so Visa, MasterCard, etc, and then you would see credit card number phone number, full, CBC, expiration, etc.

Think, like the same set of data, that a user would have typed out into your form, you’re now getting just from the browser as a JSON response, you can use that to basically send that response directly off to your gateway, your server or even let’s say in The case of like, like you know, scribe API is like directly to over to the API is for tokenization, it’s completely up to you, because it’s all plaintext these responses.

It’s important to note our our method specific. So if you selected Android pay as your form of payments, then when that response comes back, it’s going to look like an Android pay response. You’re going to be able to select this there’s a key and they’ll. Tell you that, oh there, the form of payment they chose was Android pay and then you’ll have to expect that the Android pay details object, looks different than a credit card, one which may look different than some other form of payment like an alley, pay, etc.

I mean in a good that’s because different payment methods have different requirements and are different systems and call things different things. The final step here is, we just need you to tell us to close the UI, because once you get this payment response back, we actually show us a little loading spinner and the little loading spinner is sort of waiting for you to come back and let us Know the the result of the transaction we highly encourage, but do not require that at the time that payment response comes back, you try to make the payment.

There are legitimate use cases where you can’t do this things like 3d 3ds flows, etc, but by and large, if you can submit, we recommend it, and so you call the complete you can call with success or failure, but you can also call it with nothing. This is basically an affordance for the browser to do like special UI considerations in the event of success. You know like a little animated check mark or something but yeah, it’s totally optional, but the important thing is that, when the UI closes will actually resolve that promise and that promise is your cue that the UI has been completely torn down.

So if you have animations or things that you’re trying to time with the close of that wait for that promise to resolve and then you’ll be guaranteed that any chrome UI has now been stripped from the page, and that’s it on with that. You basically have the hold experience, so in just a few lines of code, you basically get help user alleviate all that friction and difficulty I’ll type in all those annoying form fields, pretty simple, but also again, with Android pay and other future forms of tokenized payment.

You’re. Basically, getting easy tokenize forms a payment that reduced like the burden of CBC memorization, etc. So really excited about this, and this is all possible because the browser is sort of sitting as the middlemen. There proxying data back and forth between native apps on the device and and the underlying website and the developer. That’s requesting it. So my last few minutes here I want to talk about just a few UX considerations and forward-looking stuff.

So first one is my very bold. Hyperbolic statement to say, kill the cards, which is maybe a bit strong, but just sort of my way of saying if a user is coming to your site or you for a lot of users who come to your site on mobile, that only make a single purchase. Why put them through the burden of opening the page, adding it’s a card? Finding the cart page clicking the card page going to review page go to the checkout page, then.

Finally, starting the process there on mobile want to optimize their experiences. Payment requests allows you to do that quickly and immediately, so consider adding like Buy Now buttons directly to your product pages, especially on mobile, when it makes sense again. This moment won’t make sense for all businesses, but I would encourage you to go back and sort of check the numbers and see if, like this might be a powerful tool for you guys to leverage to help your users just a few other things really quickly that I’ve talked about – and you’ve heard mention here today – is thank progressive enhancement.

This is a new API. It won’t always be available, so you can’t necessarily completely depend on it, especially in a cross-browser way. Yet, although hopefully we’ll get there, so think what happens if it’s not available, you’ll still need a fallback flows etc. The second one, of course, is we encourage you to keep the set of list items high level, so don’t think of it like an itemized receipts. We don’t want the user to select this long scrolling list in the UI, if possible, try to keep it high level, subtotal tax things like that.

If it’s single item you can put it in there, but by and large we encourage high-level subtotals and things like that and then last one. Something to consider is that if you already have a user’s information – and you already have a credit card on file or some way to pay – I wouldn’t expect you to use. Don’t think you have to use payment requests like give the user the best experience they can and that means go ahead and just leveraging what you already have on file.

But if you don’t have anything and you don’t have the credit card or the credit cards expired, you need a new one, a consider payment request as a tool to help these users. You know we talked about. You know. We talked about sign up first right, but that might not always make sense for your business if you think about it, like maybe your your p0 or your most important thing is getting user through that checkout flow, then you can request an email address from payment requests And now all you need from them at the end of that funnel to sort of optimize.

The experience for next time is a password and so consider sort of leveraging this again. These are tools to help you be successful, so just a quick status update. So we are live in in Chrome as of m-53, so we’ve only been live for about, say, eight wait weeks now and it’s sort of a quiet launch. We had a great set of early launch partners that we worked very closely with and they integrated and tested and gave us a lot of great feedback again.

The API is still early. Chrome is the first browser to implements, and so we’re really thankful to all of these players for their great feedback and from it we’re actually making a lot of changes and improvements and enhancements to the underlining experience. And so I just want to talk a little bit about what you can expect to come soon, so the first one that we’re working really hard on is support for third-party payment apps.

As you go around the world. There are a lot of ways to pay in India. You know you have like paid TM and snapdeal, and all these other new emerging wallets and you go to Holland. You have ideal if you go into other countries, a whole new forms of payment that are not just credit cards and Android pay, and we want to be able to support all of this in a nice open way where we can support users from all over the Globe, no matter what, and so we’re really close to finalizing this and we hope to have support next year.

Secondly, we have a lot of spec and feature enhancements coming, so we have the shipping address types. I talked about you’ll, be able to call this within an iframe coming up soon, as well as much other small enhancements and improvements, and then we also have much of UX improvements, so we added a are scanning just recently, so you can now just like scan you. If you don’t have a credit card, you can just scan it directly into into the into the UI, so there’s things to make it faster, easier and fundamentally better onboarding flows and then just quick time lines here.

Just so you’re aware we’re sort of targeting in 56. That’s our January release as, like our next big major release. It’s going to have all these enhancements all these improvements and we’re really excited about it on you’ll, continue get updates along the way. This is all live in chrome, stable and we’d love to continue to work with you and get your feedback um everything I’ve talked about today is available online.

In a lot more detail, we have integration guides a bunch of examples in sample code where the phones come up, and then we also have a game start with Android pay. Android pay is really simple. With payment requests, it’s like less than ten lines. We do almost all the heavy lifting for you, so just a quick shout out there, but I’ll be around the rest the day I would love to chat with you learn about your challenges, things that you think you need from the browser ways that we can help.

You be successful, especially in checkouts, so thank you so much