Categories
Online Marketing

How Backlinks Help In SEO Services?

It benefits an organization if it is rightly done if backlinks are coming from good supposed sites, and also your website is back linked by reputed sites. Then it’s always a subject. Backlinks are the major factors in evaluating the importance of your site by search engines. As an initial read, the keyboard ranking will be very high, but later on, the ranking may fall down if the work is not proper.

So it really matters to be a great backlink. Expert external links are far more beneficial for ranking the website over its internal links. It’s like what others say about. You is more important than what you yourself see, whereas internal links are incredibly useful for lowering your bounce rate and keeping the reader engaged on your web pages. You


 

Categories
Online Marketing

🔎 5 Search Engines Better Than Google: DuckDuckGo, not Evil, FindSounds, Wolfram|Alpha, BoardReader

’ s article. I am Going to tell you about five search engines as good as Google and in some situations They can even beat the famous brand, I don, ’ t mean Yandex or Bing. There are Search engines which can really outperform the well-known market leaders, though in A few things only Here we go. What search engine do you use Google Yandex Or maybe Bing, In addition to the three well-known names, there are many more search tools out: There – and they can be an amazing alternative to commercial search engines, spying on every Click you make 1 DuckDuckGo Duckduckgo — quite a popular open-source search engine It uses results received from Its own search, bot and other sources, For example, Yahoo, Bing or Wikipedia Duckduckgo claims to be the search engine to ensure maximal privacy, It doesn, ’ t collect Any user data – doesn – ’ t keep logs ( there.

’ s, no such thing as search history, ) and using Cookie files is restricted as much as possible. Duckduckgo neither collects your personal Data nor shares it due to restrictions in its privacy policy. All large search engines try to personalize their search results based on what they know. About the user (, That is, you will only see the results that comply with your preferences. Or which the search engine thinks are relevant for you, ) By contrast, DuckDuckGo is there to give you the real picture, REGARDLESS of what you did.

On the Internet before – and it never shows you ads based on your previous search requests – Unlike Google or Yandex, When you open its settings, you can easily Disable ads set the region enable HTTPS by default, specify settings for opening links. And even set up the search engine appearance, Almost every aspect can be configured the Way you like it and it ’ s such a great feature: DuckDuckGo https, //duckduckgo.

Com/, 2., not Evil. Not Evil is the search engine that looks for information inside Tor, the well-known anonymous Network, That is it, ’ s a search engine you can use in your browser to surf the Tor network. After all, the first question you ask: when you start Tor browser is “. How do I get to Find the website I need ”. In fact, it ’ s very difficult to make a sound Review of Tor-compatible search engines, It takes special methodology and metrics, which I something I do not have at the moment So before we continue.

I ’ d like to warn you. Everything, I ’ m going to say is only my personal opinion. In terms of overall functionality and quality, no Evil is just as good as any other Tor search. Engine such as Grams Torch, Fess, Candle, Ahima and others, Yet it seems to be the most Stable and easy to understand, It will never show you any ads and there Is no tracking either Due to smart and continuously updated search algorithms, it is easy to find The necessary information It can search for stuff in locations where Google, Yandex and The like will never take you Still searching the so-called onion websites.

Does not always come up to your expectations; After all, it ’ s. No Google or Bing with results. Sorted by tons of criteria like behavior, backlinks and so on, With no Evil things. Are way more complicated Previously, it was known as TorSearch project With quite a wide coverage of users, The search results are good, but there is so much to Be improved yet not Evil. Https //hss3uro2hsxfogfq.Onion.

To, 3 FindSounds Findsounds — another specialized search engine It can search open resources for all Kinds of sounds home, nature, cars, people and so on. This service supports only a few Languages, but instead it features an impressive amount of tags even in the languages not supported. So you can still do some searching. The search results include sounds only All Sounds are available for download.

You can even search by sample If you need to find the sound of a musket firing or a woodpecker working or Homer Simpson, shouting that ’ s, just the right place to go. The range of tags is extremely Wide Jokes aside, it looks like a specialized service. Clearly designed for a special circle of users, But who knows what, if you may need it, one Day, FindSounds http, //www.Findsounds.Com/, 4 Wolfram|Alpha Wolfram|Alpha is a computational search.

Engine ( sometimes referred to as an “ answer: engine” ) Instead of links to articles containing key words, it gives you a ready answer to your Query, For example, if you ask how many bytes in a megabyte Wolfram|Alpha, will show you Comparison tables, and sometimes even graphs, Unfortunately, for some users from Eastern Europe Wolfram|Alpha doesn, ’ t support Cyrillic languages, However, it is the best resource to search for facts and compute data.

Wolfram|Alpha Accumulates and systematizes knowledge from all fields, including science, culture and Entertainment If the database already contains a ready answer to your query, the system shows It at once and if it doesn ’ t it computes the result and then displays it. It only shows The required information and NOTHING else, If you are a student analyst journalist, Or a research worker you can use Wolfram|Alpha to search and compute data related to your Activities, Certainly, this service is far from processing all queries in the best way.

Possible but it is constantly developing and becoming smarter every day. Wolfram|Alpha https //www.Wolframalpha.Com/ 5 BoardReader Boardreader is the engine for text, search in forums, question and answer websites and Other similar communities, It lets you narrow the field of searching To social media only With special filters applied, you can quickly find posts and comments. In accordance with your search criteria, language date and website name, Boardreader is a great tool when you need opinions from real users rather than advertising.

Babble or if you are interested in following a discussion, It ’ s a very special search engine, but I ’ m sure many people all over the web will appreciate. It BoardReader http //boardreader.Com/ As the bottom line. I have to say that many Alternative search engines tend to be short-lived, Things are pretty easy, they can be niche Projects with a small circle of fans and users, which means questionable prospects of going Commercial or they may have none of that stuff at all.

Looking at the examples you have seen in this article, it ’ s evident that such search engines Either specialize in some narrow field, which is SO FAR not too important to get Google Or Yandex interested enough or they are meant to test certain ideas which are not applied. In typical search patterns, yet I ’ m sure that if searching Tor becomes more Popular and at least one percent of Google users wants it.

Top services will start looking. For ways to give the people what they are looking for, If the online audience behaves In the way to suggest that most users in a significant number of queries, find results. Without user-dependent factors to be more relevant, Yandex or Google will respond quickly. By providing this specific type of results, more often Truly in many aspects, the search engines – I told you about – have a long way to go before They can really compete against the top products like Google and Yandex (, and even Bing is too Much for them ), Yet each of the unique services can offer you something that top search engines.

Can ’ t beat, That is all for now Hit the Like button below And subscribe to Hetman Software blog Leave comments to ask questions. Thank you. For reading Good luck –


 

Categories
Online Marketing

Site Speed: What SEOs Need to Know #AskGoogleWebmasters

We’re going to be answering questions on the topic of speed that were submitted with the hashtag ask Google webmasters on Twitter. So, let’s start off with a question from row Heat: what is the ideal page speed of any content for better ranking on search? Oh you’re, asking me that question okay.

So basically we are categorizing pages, more or less as like, really good and pretty bad. So, there’s not really like a threshold in between it’s just like we are more or less roughly categorizing the speed experience for users and how are we actually doing that? Where do we get the data from yeah? That’s that’s important, so we mostly get data from two places. On the one hand, we try to calculate a theoretical speed of a page using lab data, and then we also use real field data from users.

Who’ve actually tried to use those pages and that field data is similar to the chrome user. Experience report, data cool, so we are having like hypothetical data and practical data, so we don’t really have a threshold to give away. But basically the recommendation, I would say, is just make sites fast for users. That’s what it boils down to that sounds good yeah. The next question comes from Olga and Olga is wondering if a website’s mobile speed is best looked at using the test, my site tool, the GT, metrics tool or PageSpeed insights.

Hmm, that’s a really good question. What’s the most important tool for SEO, we have multiple tools that measure multiple things and I can understand that that can be kind of confusing at times in general. These tools measure things in slightly different ways, so what I usually recommend is taking these different tools. Getting the data that you get back from that and using them to discover kind of low-hanging fruit on your webpages, so things that you can easily improve to really give your page a speed bump how’s that sound.

No, that sounds pretty good and also the tools differently. Like aimed right some some of these tools like test my side is pretty high level, so, like everyone understands roughly, what’s going on there, whereas GT matrix is a lot more technical and PageSpeed insights. I think it’s kind of in the middle of that so depending on who you are catering to who you’re trying to give this report to to get things fixed, you might use one or the other, so figuring out what is the low-hanging fruit and using the tool That gives you the best insight into that for the audience that you’re trying to convince.

Is it a sea level? Is it a other marketer? Is it someone from the tech side like this is a developer? Then you probably take a different tool. Next question comes from owner owner is asking: I am testing an almost-empty page on dev tool audits and it usually gives me minimum results which are 0.8 milliseconds for everything and 20 milliseconds for fij what it’s fed. First, input delay. First, input delay, of course, but sometimes it gives worse results for TTI, FCI and Phil.

Okay, let’s talk about these metrics fit. We have covered first input delay. Tti is time to interactive. That’s when you can first interact with the page and FCI is first cpu idle, which means that there’s no more JavaScript work or other work that needs to be done by the CPU. So it’s the same page same code, different numbers. Why would that happen? Well, first things: first, these measurements aren’t perfect right.

So if it’s between 0.8 milliseconds and 20 milliseconds 20 milliseconds is a lot more than 0.8, but it’s still quite a short amount of time. If you think about it, you roughly have 10 milliseconds for a single frame to draw so yeah 20 milliseconds isn’t too bad, so you will always see some some basically noise in that measurement and also don’t get too hung up on these metrics. Specifically, if you see that there’s a perceptible problem and there’s actually like an issue that your site stays like working on the main thread and doing CPU work for a minute or 20 seconds, that’s what you want to investigate if it’s 20 milliseconds, it’s probably fine! Our next question comes from Drew and drew asks us what is or are best metric or metrics to look at when you want to decide if a page is fast or slow, and why or why not? Would you just look at things like FCP, which is first content full pained FMP, which is first meaningful paint, instead of just the scores that these tools give you Wow? I don’t know, Martin.

You need to tell me some more about that right. Okay, so I guess the question here really boils down to what’s the metric that you should look at and that’s a really tricky one, because I guess it depends on the side. It’s the typical. It depends answer if you have just a website where people are reading. Your content and not interacting as much then I think, first meaningful paint or first content fool paint, it’s probably more important than first interactive delay or, first sorry, first input delay or time to interactive.

But if it’s a really interactive web application, where you want people to immediately jump in and do something, then probably that metric is more important, so don’t try to break it down, and that brings us to the scores. The problem in this course is they’re. Oversimplifying things. Aren’t they yeah, I it sounds like it. I mean all of these measurements sound like they’re, they’re, measuring different things and ultimately trying to understand what what a user would perceive when they access the page, so their score might be.

I guess a simple way to look at it overall, but it’s probably not all of the details that you need. It just gives you a ballpark. Really it’s like how fast is this page 5? What does that mean? It doesn’t really convey me, doesn’t it so, I would say like use that, to figure out how you’re roughly doing and then use the specific insights, the different tools give you to figure out where you have to improve or what isn’t going so well.

Wow yeah sounds like speed, is a tricky topic and you kind of have to know what’s what you’re measuring so that you can take action on the right things yep. So would that kind of explain why there is no simple number that Google is just giving yeah? So that definitely explains it because then, if you think about it, you can’t break down speed into one simple number. It is a bunch of factors if I’m painting really quickly, but my app is all about interaction.

It’s a messenger, so I show everything I show the message history, but if I try to answer the message that I just got and it takes me 20 seconds until I actually can tap on the input field and start typing, is that fast not really, but is It so important that I can use the contact form on the bottom of a blog post within the first 10 seconds. Not necessarily is it so? What how would you put that into a number you don’t? So I guess it’s hard speed.

Speed sounds hard. What what do you think will this get easier? I guess it will get easier, but it will never go to a point where you just have a score that you optimize for and be done with it right. It is such a broad topic that it’s really hard to break that down into like one number. Okay, so you imagine, the more advanced people will continue to focus on the the kinda, metrics and counting milliseconds and others will look at kind of a bigger overview picture.

I guess so, and together will try to find ways to improve the speed of the pages overall. I think browsers also doing a lot of work to make things faster in general and easier to understand, but, generally speaking, you will still need to go and do the work of figuring out. What matters to you, your audience and your website right is it interactive. Is it content? Full panes depends that sounds cool yeah.

So I expect more questions on speed on the hash tag. Ask Google webmasters and, as we get those questions, we’ll ask an expert like Marcin, who knows all of these three-letter abbreviations and who can help us figure out, which ones are the right ones. So thanks for submitting all of these questions and hopefully see you again on one of the future episode. Thank you very much for having me and thanks for all the questions.


 

Categories
Online Marketing

Multiple H1 Headings: How to Handle Them for SEO & Accessibility? #AskGoogleWebmasters

Today’s question is from Marcus Chaepelli Marcus is asking. Can we have a clear answer to the question how to handle headings and accessibility? I see a lot of multiple H1’s ( all, but one are usually hidden ) out there on the web. Everybody treats it differently and stuff like the tag. So this is a pretty common question and it’s pretty straightforward.

Our systems don’t have a problem when it comes to multiple H1 headings. On a page, That’s a fairly common pattern on the web. We use headings to better understand the context of different parts of a page Having clear semantically. Understandable headings is useful in understanding any given page. However, We have to work with the web as we find it and a lot of it isn’t semantically structured at all For users.

The difference is minimal. Both kinds of pages can be extremely relevant to a question that they have In turn. Our systems aren’t too picky and we’ll try to work with the HTML as we find it, be it one H1 heading multiple H1 headings or just styled pieces of text without semantic HTML at all. In Short, when thinking about this topic SEO shouldn’t be your primary objective. Instead think about your users, If you have ways of making your content accessible to them, be it by using multiple H1 headings or other standard HTML constructs, then that’s not going to get in the way of your SEO efforts.

I hope you found this answer useful And, if there’s anything else, we can answer for you. In short, article form, please send us your questions using the # AskGoogleWebmasters hashtag on Twitter, so that we can include them in one of the future articles To stay in the loop make sure to subscribe to the blog and see you next time.